These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29157763)
1. Does Site Matter? Comparing Accuracy and Patient Comfort of Blood Glucose Samples Taken From the Finger and Palm of the Perioperative Patient. Farmer L; Winfield C; Quatrara B; Letzkus L; Schenck P; Finneran P; Pollak D; McCaskill C; Nealy R; Conaway M J Perianesth Nurs; 2017 Dec; 32(6):573-577. PubMed ID: 29157763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient perceptions of different lancing sites for self-monitoring of blood glucose: a comparison of fingertip site with palm site using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Ito T; Kamoi K; Minagawa S; Kimura K; Kobayashi A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 4(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 20663455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical impact of prandial state, exercise, and site preparation on the equivalence of alternative-site blood glucose testing. Bina DM; Anderson RL; Johnson ML; Bergenstal RM; Kendall DM Diabetes Care; 2003 Apr; 26(4):981-5. PubMed ID: 12663560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study. Fedele D; Corsi A; Noacco C; Prisco F; Squatrito S; Torre E; Iafusco D; Errico MK; Toniato R; Nicolucci A; Franciosi M; De Berardis G; Neri L Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 14709201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of glucose levels in capillary blood samples obtained from a variety of body sites. Peled N; Wong D; Gwalani SL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):35-44; discussion 45-7. PubMed ID: 12017418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Kempe KC; Budd D; Stern M; Ellison JM; Saari LA; Adiletto CA; Olin B; Price DA; Horwitz DL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(6):916-26. PubMed ID: 16386098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Fingertip vs Palm Site Sampling on Pain Perception, and Variation in Capillary Blood Glucose Level among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Anitha Pavithran A; Ramamoorthy L; Bs S; Murugesan R; Mj K J Caring Sci; 2020 Dec; 9(4):182-187. PubMed ID: 33409161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of an automated device for alternative site blood glucose monitoring. Fineberg SE; Bergenstal RM; Bernstein RM; Laffel LM; Schwartz SL Diabetes Care; 2001 Jul; 24(7):1217-20. PubMed ID: 11423505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of skin temperature and testing site on blood glucose measurements taken by a modern blood glucose monitoring device. Haupt A; Berg B; Paschen P; Dreyer M; Häring HU; Smedegaard J; Matthaei S Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Aug; 7(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 16120031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternate site testing for hemoglobin A1C in children with diabetes. Flores SL Diabetes Educ; 2010; 36(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20693439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system. Caswell M; Frank J; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Dunne N; Warchal-Windham ME; Morin R Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 25494048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of alternate site testing--comparing arm and finger blood glucose results in glucose dynamic states. Lock JP; Szuts EZ; Malomo KJ; Anagnostopoulos A; Rao S Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 12017426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a novel test strip technology for blood glucose monitoring: accuracy at hypoglycaemic glucose levels. Bellary S; Cameron H; Macleod K; Malecha M; Koria K; Raja P; Cabezudo JD; Ellison J Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 98(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 23063304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of tight intraoperative glycemic control during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Lecomte P; Foubert L; Coddens J; Dewulf B; Nobels F; Casselman F; Cammu G J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):937-42. PubMed ID: 21640613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range. Zijlstra E; Heinemann L; Fischer A; Kapitza C J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Capillary blood sample for type 2 diabetes screening: fingertip versus forearm]. Cuevas Fernández FJ; Iglesias Girón MJ; Gómez de Segura IL; Aguirre-Jaime A Med Clin (Barc); 2004 Jul; 123(5):174-6. PubMed ID: 15274795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic. Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring. Lee DM; Weinert SE; Miller EE Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):13-23; discussion 45-7. PubMed ID: 12017415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glucose monitoring at the thenar: evaluation of upper dermal blood glucose kinetics during rapid systemic blood glucose changes. Jungheim K; Koschinsky T Horm Metab Res; 2002 Jun; 34(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12173073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]