These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29159803)

  • 1. A note on the expected value of the Rand index.
    Steinley D; Brusco MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):287-299. PubMed ID: 29159803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index.
    Steinley D
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):386-96. PubMed ID: 15355155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The variance of the adjusted Rand index.
    Steinley D; Brusco MJ; Hubert L
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 26881693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Study of the Comparability of External Criteria for Hierarchical Cluster Analysis.
    Milligan GW; Cooper MC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1986 Oct; 21(4):441-58. PubMed ID: 26828221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two estimation algorithms for Samejima's continuous IRT model.
    Zopluoglu C
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 22733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Omega: A General Formulation of the Rand Index of Cluster Recovery Suitable for Non-disjoint Solutions.
    Collins LM; Dent CW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1988 Apr; 23(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 26764947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Profiling local optima in K-means clustering: developing a diagnostic technique.
    Steinley D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 16784337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A general proof of consistency of heuristic classification for cognitive diagnosis models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):387-409. PubMed ID: 25872467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.
    Gu X; Mulder J; Hoijtink H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):229-261. PubMed ID: 28857129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The UMP Exact Test and the Confidence Interval for Person Parameters in IRT Models.
    Liu X; Han Z; Johnson MS
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):182-202. PubMed ID: 28836133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DIF Cancellation in the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 23816591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias and standard error for social reciprocity measurements.
    Solanas A; Leiva D; Salafranca L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):139-61. PubMed ID: 19486549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for Local Dependence with the Rasch Model: The Paradox of Information Increase.
    Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):262-282. PubMed ID: 28027051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Simulation Study to Assess the Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Power of Ordinal Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Analysis in Rating Scales.
    Allahyari E; Jafari P; Bagheri Z
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():5080826. PubMed ID: 27403207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scale Anchoring with the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 28453498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
    Demars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.