These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29161271)

  • 1. A mathematical function for the description of nutrient-response curve.
    Ahmadi H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187292. PubMed ID: 29161271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for simulating nutritional requirement and response studies with all organisms to increase research efficiency.
    Vedenov D; Alhotan RA; Wang R; Pesti GM
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Feb; 117(3):473-477. PubMed ID: 28236809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The determination of nutritional requirements: mathematical modeling of nutrient-response curves.
    Mercer LP
    J Nutr; 1992 Mar; 122(3 Suppl):706-8. PubMed ID: 1542036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building beef cow nutritional programs with the 1996 NRC beef cattle requirements model.
    Lardy GP; Adams DC; Klopfenstein TJ; Patterson HH
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E83-92. PubMed ID: 15471818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The determination of nutritional requirements in rats: mathematical modeling of sigmoidal, inhibited nutrient-response curves.
    Mercer LP; May HE; Dodds SJ
    J Nutr; 1989 Oct; 119(10):1465-71. PubMed ID: 2511286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of nutrient-response relationships.
    Schulz AR
    J Nutr; 1987 Nov; 117(11):1950-8. PubMed ID: 3316539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncovering the nutritional landscape of food.
    Kim S; Sung J; Foo M; Jin YS; Kim PJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118697. PubMed ID: 25768022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of diet- and host-related factors in nutrient bioavailability and thus in nutrient-based dietary requirement estimates.
    Gibson RS
    Food Nutr Bull; 2007 Mar; 28(1 Suppl International):S77-100. PubMed ID: 17521121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of mathematical functions to describe growth and efficiency of phosphorus utilization in growing pigs.
    Kebreab E; Schulin-Zeuthen M; Lopez S; Soler J; Dias RS; de Lange CF; France J
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2498-507. PubMed ID: 17565069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An economic comparison of several models fitted to nutritional response data.
    Pesti GM; Vedenov D
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):3344-9. PubMed ID: 21571899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mathematical approach to predicting biological values from ruminal pH measurements.
    AlZahal O; Kebreab E; France J; McBride BW
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3777-85. PubMed ID: 17638989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the National Research Council (2001) dairy model and derivation of new prediction equations. 1. Digestibility of fiber, fat, protein, and nonfiber carbohydrate.
    White RR; Roman-Garcia Y; Firkins JL; VandeHaar MJ; Armentano LE; Weiss WP; McGill T; Garnett R; Hanigan MD
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 May; 100(5):3591-3610. PubMed ID: 28259403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Food based approaches to improve vitamin and mineral nutrition adequacy].
    Oyarzún MT; Uauy R; Olivares S
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2001 Mar; 51(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 11515235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of some fish nutrition methodologies.
    Belal IE
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Mar; 96(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 15491819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Index of Nutritional Quality for a balanced diet. New help for an old problem.
    Sorenson AW; Wyse BW; Wittwer AJ; Hansen RG
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1976 Mar; 68(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 55430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-facilitated nutritional analysis.
    Goodson JM; Sproat R; Silverstein SJ
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(2):407-12. PubMed ID: 234985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Several 'problem nutrients' are identified in complementary feeding of Guatemalan infants with continued breastfeeding using the concept of 'critical nutrient density'.
    Vossenaar M; Hernández L; Campos R; Solomons NW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Jan; 67(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 23132655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nutritional consequences of foraging in primates: the relationship of nutrient intakes to nutrient requirements.
    Oftedal OT
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1991 Nov; 334(1270):161-9, discussion 169-70. PubMed ID: 1685574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Nutrient Guide as a dietary assessment tool.
    Ries CP; Daehler JL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1986 Feb; 86(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 3944392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.