BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29161987)

  • 1. Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Todd AE; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Landsberger DM
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739745. PubMed ID: 29161987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music and lexical tone perception in Chinese adult cochlear implant users.
    Wang S; Liu B; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Chen X; Han D; Zhang L
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 22362607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.
    Stupak N; Todd AE; Landsberger DM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):301-312. PubMed ID: 33606415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau J; Blamey P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29327. PubMed ID: 22195046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
    Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
    Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes.
    Singh S; Kong YY; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 19194298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
    Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Tao D; Deng R; Jiang Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Chen B
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 25099401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Melodic interval perception with acoustic and electric hearing in bimodal and single-sided deaf cochlear implant listeners.
    Spitzer ER; Galvin JJ; Friedmann DR; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 400():108136. PubMed ID: 33310263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.
    Zeng FG; Tang Q; Lu T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):1091-103. PubMed ID: 17077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours.
    Digeser FM; Hast A; Wesarg T; Hessel H; Hoppe U
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 269(11):2317-26. PubMed ID: 22193870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.