150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2916296)
1. Flow cytometric study comparing paired bladder washing and voided urine for bladder cancer detection.
Konchuba AM; Schellhammer PF; Alexander JP; Wright GL
Urology; 1989 Feb; 33(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 2916296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation method useful for cytologic examination and DNA flow cytometry of exfoliated bladder cells.
Howell LP; Deitch AD; Andreotti VA; Westrick LA; White RD
Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 7683835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urine: a suitable sample for deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry studies in patients with bladder cancer.
deVere White RW; Deitch AD; Baker WC; Strand MA
J Urol; 1988 May; 139(5):926-8. PubMed ID: 3361665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A comparative study of the sensitivity of bladder washing flow cytometry, voided urine cytology and bladder washing cytology in the detection of bladder carcinoma].
Tachibana M; Jitsukawa S; Tazaki H; Tashiro Y
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 80(7):1025-30. PubMed ID: 2607716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is voided urine suitable for flow cytometric DNA analysis?
Mellon K; Shenton BK; Neal DE
Br J Urol; 1991 Jan; 67(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 1993276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on exfoliated urothelial cells in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
Degtyar P; Neulander E; Zirkin H; Yusim I; Douvdevani A; Mermershtain W; Kaneti J; Manor E
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):398-401. PubMed ID: 14972510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure of anticytokeratin 18 antibody to improve flow cytometric detection of bladder cancer.
Konchuba AM; Clements MC; Schellhammer PF; Schlossberg SM; Wright GL
Cancer; 1992 Dec; 70(12):2879-84. PubMed ID: 1280531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinically applicable method to preserve urine and bladder washing cells for flow cytometric monitoring of bladder cancer patients.
Deitch AD; Andreotti VA; Strand MA; Howell L; deVere White RW
J Urol; 1990 Apr; 143(4):700-5. PubMed ID: 2179581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bladder cancer risk assessment with quantitative fluorescence image analysis of tumor markers in exfoliated bladder cells.
Bonner RB; Hemstreet GP; Fradet Y; Rao JY; Min KW; Hurst RE
Cancer; 1993 Oct; 72(8):2461-9. PubMed ID: 8402463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voided urine flow cytometry in screening high-risk patients for the presence of bladder cancer.
Hermansen DK; Badalament RA; Bretton PR; Kimmel M; Aswad CM; Whitmore WF; Melamed MR
J Occup Med; 1990 Sep; 32(9):894-7. PubMed ID: 2074515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of DNA image cytometry and urinary cytology with cells from voided urine in the detection of bladder cancer.
Planz B; Synek C; Robben J; Böcking A; Marberger M
Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):782-6. PubMed ID: 11068301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urine or bladder washings in the cytologic evaluation of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. A comparison made under routine conditions supplemented by flow cytometric DNA analysis.
Wijkström H; Lundh B; Tribukait B
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1987; 21(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 3616503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience.
Billerey C; Lamy B; Bittard H; Rozan S; Carbillet JP
World J Urol; 1993; 11(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8401634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein, fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors.
Eissa S; Swellam M; Sadek M; Mourad MS; El Ahmady O; Khalifa A
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 12131289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of DNA flow cytometry and cytology of bladder washings: review of discordant cases.
Bakhos R; Shankey TV; Flanigan RC; Fisher S; Wojcik EM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 10649514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometry of ethanol-fixed versus fresh bladder barbotage specimens.
Ratliff JE; Klein FA; White FK
J Urol; 1985 Jun; 133(6):958-60. PubMed ID: 3889375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voided urine versus bladder washing cytology for detection of urothelial carcinoma: which is better?
Keller AK; Jensen JB
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):290-292. PubMed ID: 28398114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay for telomerase as a diagnostic modality in recurrent bladder cancer.
Dalbagni G; Han W; Zhang ZF; Cordon-Cardo C; Saigo P; Fair WR; Herr H; Kim N; Moore MA
Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Sep; 3(9):1593-8. PubMed ID: 9815848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple and practical technic for detecting cancer cells in urine and urinary bladder washings by flow cytometry.
Pritchett TR; Kanzler AW; Nichols PW; Bakke AC; Hechinger MK; Skinner DG; Parker JW
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Aug; 84(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 4025224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image cytometric deoxyribonucleic acid analysis of urine specimens as an adjunct to visual cytology in the detection of urothelial cell carcinoma.
Amberson JB; Laino JP
J Urol; 1993 Jan; 149(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 8417214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
