145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29163254)
1. Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review.
Wheeler RL; Gabbert F
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1830. PubMed ID: 29163254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.
Badham SP; Poirier M; Gandhi N; Hadjivassiliou A; Maylor EA
Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):758-770. PubMed ID: 27831714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.
Tullis JG; Fraundorf SH
Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):765-781. PubMed ID: 34731430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generating mnemonics boosts recall of chemistry information.
Tullis JG; Qiu J
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 33939460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age differences in encoding specificity.
Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Context and cue cards in young children's testimony: a comparison of brief narrative elaboration and context reinstatement.
Bowen CJ; Howie PM
J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 12558215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How intention to retrieve a memory and expectation that a memory will come to mind influence the retrieval of autobiographical memories.
Barzykowski K; Niedźwieńska A; Mazzoni G
Conscious Cogn; 2019 Jul; 72():31-48. PubMed ID: 31078046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval of bilingual autobiographical memories: effects of cue language and cue imageability.
Mortensen L; Berntsen D; Bohn OS
Memory; 2015; 23(2):138-56. PubMed ID: 24443835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The myth of the encoding-retrieval match.
Nairne JS
Memory; 2002; 10(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12396651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of cue distinctiveness on odor-based context-dependent memory.
Herz RS
Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 9184489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental reinstatement of encoding context improves episodic remembering.
Bramão I; Karlsson A; Johansson M
Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():15-26. PubMed ID: 28710908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?
Tullis JG; Finley JR
Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1308-1319. PubMed ID: 34546833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Configural processing in memory retrieval: multiple cues and ensemble representations.
Dosher BA; Rosedale GS
Cogn Psychol; 1997 Aug; 33(3):209-65. PubMed ID: 9245470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of executive function in autobiographical memory retrieval: does the type of cue word matter?
Guler OE; Mackovichova S
Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):423-430. PubMed ID: 30142030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of cue content on retrieval from autobiographical memory.
Uzer T; Brown NR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():84-91. PubMed ID: 27940026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transformed Neural Pattern Reinstatement during Episodic Memory Retrieval.
Xiao X; Dong Q; Gao J; Men W; Poldrack RA; Xue G
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(11):2986-2998. PubMed ID: 28202612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrieval intentionality and forgetting: How retention time and cue distinctiveness affect involuntary and voluntary retrieval of episodic memories.
Staugaard SR; Berntsen D
Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):893-905. PubMed ID: 30725379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of similarity on environmental context cueing.
Smith SM; Handy JD; Angello G; Manzano I
Memory; 2014; 22(5):493-508. PubMed ID: 23721293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
