These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29163319)

  • 1. Functional Relations Modulate the Responsiveness to Affordances Despite the Impact of Conflicting Stimulus-Response Mappings.
    Vastano R; Finn M; Barnes-Holmes D
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1951. PubMed ID: 29163319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Too much to handle? Interference from distractors with similar affordances on target selection for handled objects.
    Haddad L; Wamain Y; Kalénine S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290226. PubMed ID: 37643170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2605-2613. PubMed ID: 31066635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool-object perception.
    Natraj N; Poole V; Mizelle JC; Flumini A; Borghi AM; Wheaton LA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):506-19. PubMed ID: 23261936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect.
    Azaad S; Laham SM; Shields P
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():105-127. PubMed ID: 31071502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One hand, two objects: emergence of affordance in contexts.
    Borghi AM; Flumini A; Natraj N; Wheaton LA
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Oct; 80(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22634033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The visual encoding of tool-object affordances.
    Natraj N; Pella YM; Borghi AM; Wheaton LA
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():512-27. PubMed ID: 26420170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.
    Ambrosecchia M; Marino BF; Gawryszewski LG; Riggio L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():283. PubMed ID: 26042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response-response compatibility during bimanual movements: evidence for the conceptual coding of action.
    Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 16447382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity to hierarchical relations among affordances in the assembly of asymmetric tools.
    Wagman JB; Caputo SE; Stoffregen TA
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2923-33. PubMed ID: 27282421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of the Vertical Spatial Metaphor of Power Concepts Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.
    Hong B; Zhang L; Sun H
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1422. PubMed ID: 31316420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keep away from danger: dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations.
    Anelli F; Nicoletti R; Bolzani R; Borghi AM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():344. PubMed ID: 23847512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tool and object affordances: An ecological eye-tracking study.
    Federico G; Brandimonte MA
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103582. PubMed ID: 31255885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict in the kitchen: Contextual modulation of responsiveness to affordances.
    Wokke ME; Knot SL; Fouad A; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Feb; 40():141-6. PubMed ID: 26821243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring implicit attitudes: A positive framing bias flaw in the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP).
    O'Shea B; Watson DG; Brown GD
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Feb; 28(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 26075407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. I give you a cup, I get a cup: a kinematic study on social intention.
    Scorolli C; Miatton M; Wheaton LA; Borghi AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():196-204. PubMed ID: 24680723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.