These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29163613)

  • 1. A Comparison of Petiole Hydraulics and Aquaporin Expression in an Anisohydric and Isohydric Cultivar of Grapevine in Response to Water-Stress Induced Cavitation.
    Shelden MC; Vandeleur R; Kaiser BN; Tyerman SD
    Front Plant Sci; 2017; 8():1893. PubMed ID: 29163613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine.
    Vandeleur RK; Mayo G; Shelden MC; Gilliham M; Kaiser BN; Tyerman SD
    Plant Physiol; 2009 Jan; 149(1):445-60. PubMed ID: 18987216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between stomatal behavior, xylem vulnerability to cavitation and leaf water relations in two cultivars of Vitis vinifera.
    Tombesi S; Nardini A; Farinelli D; Palliotti A
    Physiol Plant; 2014 Nov; 152(3):453-64. PubMed ID: 24597791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas).
    Zufferey V; Cochard H; Ameglio T; Spring JL; Viret O
    J Exp Bot; 2011 Jul; 62(11):3885-94. PubMed ID: 21447755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Hydraulics Between Two Grapevine Cultivars Reveals Differences in Stomatal Regulation Under Water Stress and Exogenous ABA Applications.
    Dayer S; Scharwies JD; Ramesh SA; Sullivan W; Doerflinger FC; Pagay V; Tyerman SD
    Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():705. PubMed ID: 32636852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability.
    Hochberg U; Bonel AG; David-Schwartz R; Degu A; Fait A; Cochard H; Peterlunger E; Herrera JC
    Planta; 2017 Jun; 245(6):1091-1104. PubMed ID: 28214919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of isohydric and anisohydric Vitis vinifera L. cultivars reveals a fine balance between hydraulic resistances, driving forces and transpiration in ripening berries.
    Scharwies JD; Tyerman SD
    Funct Plant Biol; 2017 Feb; 44(3):324-338. PubMed ID: 32480567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The grapevine root-specific aquaporin VvPIP2;4N controls root hydraulic conductance and leaf gas exchange under well-watered conditions but not under water stress.
    Perrone I; Gambino G; Chitarra W; Vitali M; Pagliarani C; Riccomagno N; Balestrini R; Kaldenhoff R; Uehlein N; Gribaudo I; Schubert A; Lovisolo C
    Plant Physiol; 2012 Oct; 160(2):965-77. PubMed ID: 22923680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene expression in vessel-associated cells upon xylem embolism repair in Vitis vinifera L. petioles.
    Chitarra W; Balestrini R; Vitali M; Pagliarani C; Perrone I; Schubert A; Lovisolo C
    Planta; 2014 Apr; 239(4):887-99. PubMed ID: 24402563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coordination of xylem hydraulics and stomatal regulation in keeping the integrity of xylem water transport in shoots of two compound-leaved tree species.
    Liu YY; Song J; Wang M; Li N; Niu CY; Hao GY
    Tree Physiol; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1333-42. PubMed ID: 26209618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydraulics and gas exchange recover more rapidly from severe drought stress in small pot-grown grapevines than in field-grown plants.
    Romero P; Botía P; Keller M
    J Plant Physiol; 2017 Sep; 216():58-73. PubMed ID: 28577386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grapevine petioles are more sensitive to drought induced embolism than stems: evidence from in vivo MRI and microcomputed tomography observations of hydraulic vulnerability segmentation.
    Hochberg U; Albuquerque C; Rachmilevitch S; Cochard H; David-Schwartz R; Brodersen CR; McElrone A; Windt CW
    Plant Cell Environ; 2016 Sep; 39(9):1886-94. PubMed ID: 26648337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining physiological, water relations, and hydraulic vulnerability traits to determine anisohydric and isohydric behavior in almond (
    Álvarez-Maldini C; Acevedo M; Estay D; Aros F; Dumroese RK; Sandoval S; Pinto M
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():974050. PubMed ID: 36092408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A continuum of stomatal responses to water deficits among 17 wine grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera).
    Levin AD; Williams LE; Matthews MA
    Funct Plant Biol; 2019 Jan; 47(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 31615618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A putative role for TIP and PIP aquaporins in dynamics of leaf hydraulic and stomatal conductances in grapevine under water stress and re-watering.
    Pou A; Medrano H; Flexas J; Tyerman SD
    Plant Cell Environ; 2013 Apr; 36(4):828-43. PubMed ID: 23046275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought.
    Coupel-Ledru A; Lebon É; Christophe A; Doligez A; Cabrera-Bosquet L; Péchier P; Hamard P; This P; Simonneau T
    J Exp Bot; 2014 Nov; 65(21):6205-18. PubMed ID: 25381432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in leaf stomatal conductance, petiole hydraulics and vessel morphology in grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas) under different light and irrigation regimes.
    Dayer S; Peña JP; Gindro K; Torregrosa L; Voinesco F; Martínez L; Prieto JA; Zufferey V
    Funct Plant Biol; 2017 Jun; 44(7):679-693. PubMed ID: 32480598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soil water-holding capacity mediates hydraulic and hormonal signals of near-isohydric and near-anisohydric Vitis cultivars in potted grapevines.
    Tramontini S; Döring J; Vitali M; Ferrandino A; Stoll M; Lovisolo C
    Funct Plant Biol; 2014 Oct; 41(11):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 32481062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct transcriptome responses to water limitation in isohydric and anisohydric grapevine cultivars.
    Dal Santo S; Palliotti A; Zenoni S; Tornielli GB; Fasoli M; Paci P; Tombesi S; Frioni T; Silvestroni O; Bellincontro A; d'Onofrio C; Matarese F; Gatti M; Poni S; Pezzotti M
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):815. PubMed ID: 27765014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Near isohydric grapevine cultivar displays higher photosynthetic efficiency and photorespiration rates under drought stress as compared with near anisohydric grapevine cultivar.
    Hochberg U; Degu A; Fait A; Rachmilevitch S
    Physiol Plant; 2013 Apr; 147(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 22901023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.