These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29164124)
1. Sterile Reverse Osmosis Water Combined with Friction Are Optimal for Channel and Lever Cavity Sample Collection of Flexible Duodenoscopes. Alfa MJ; Singh H; Nugent Z; Duerksen D; Schultz G; Reidy C; DeGagne P; Olson N Front Med (Lausanne); 2017; 4():191. PubMed ID: 29164124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel polytetrafluoroethylene-channel model, which simulates low levels of culturable bacteria in buildup biofilm after repeated endoscope reprocessing. Alfa MJ; Ribeiro MM; da Costa Luciano C; Franca R; Olson N; DeGagne P; Singh H Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):442-451.e1. PubMed ID: 28551023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improper positioning of the elevator lever of duodenoscopes may lead to sequestered bacteria that survive disinfection by automated endoscope reprocessors. Alfa MJ; Singh H; Duerksen DR; Schultz G; Reidy C; DeGagne P; Olson N Am J Infect Control; 2018 Jan; 46(1):73-75. PubMed ID: 28918989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Turbulent fluid flow is a novel closed-system sample extraction method for flexible endoscope channels of various inner diameters. Sohn SY; Alfa MJ; Lai R; Tabani Y; Labib ME J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Jan; 168():105782. PubMed ID: 31758953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of cleaning monitoring combined with channel purge storage on elimination of Escherichia coli and environmental bacteria from duodenoscopes. Singh H; Duerksen DR; Schultz G; Reidy C; DeGagne P; Olson N; Nugent Z; Bernard KA; Alfa MJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 29476844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of duodenoscope culture and quarantine after manufacturer-recommended cleaning process. Mark JA; Underberg K; Kramer RE Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jun; 91(6):1328-1333. PubMed ID: 31945325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher yield in duodenoscope cultures collected with addition of neutralizing agent. Kwakman JA; Vos MC; Bruno MJ J Hosp Infect; 2023 Feb; 132():28-35. PubMed ID: 36414167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective microbiologic evaluation of the forceps elevator in closed-channel duodenoscopes after reprocessing. Paula H; Tribl B; Presterl E; Diab-El Schahawi M Am J Infect Control; 2017 Feb; 45(2):121-125. PubMed ID: 28341284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy. Alfa MJ; DeGagne P; Olson N; Fatima I BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Jul; 10():200. PubMed ID: 20618935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) channel model of cyclic-buildup biofilm and traditional biofilm: The impact of friction, and detergent on cleaning and subsequent high-level disinfection. Ribeiro MM; Graziano KU; Olson N; França R; Alfa MJ Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 31685050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of adenosine triphosphate to audit manual cleaning of flexible endoscope channels. Alfa MJ; Fatima I; Olson N Am J Infect Control; 2013 Mar; 41(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 22980510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new buildup biofilm model that mimics accumulation of material in flexible endoscope channels. da Costa Luciano C; Olson N; DeGagne P; Franca R; Tipple AFV; Alfa M J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():224-229. PubMed ID: 27345713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: a nationwide study. Rauwers AW; Voor In 't Holt AF; Buijs JG; de Groot W; Hansen BE; Bruno MJ; Vos MC Gut; 2018 Sep; 67(9):1637-1645. PubMed ID: 29636382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent root-cause analysis of contributing factors, including dismantling of 2 duodenoscopes, to investigate an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Rauwers AW; Troelstra A; Fluit AC; Wissink C; Loeve AJ; Vleggaar FP; Bruno MJ; Vos MC; Bode LG; Monkelbaan JF Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Nov; 90(5):793-804. PubMed ID: 31102643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices. Alfa MJ; Howie R BMC Infect Dis; 2009 May; 9():56. PubMed ID: 19426471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of a novel-design duodenoscope ends outbreak of a VIM-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Verfaillie CJ; Bruno MJ; Voor in 't Holt AF; Buijs JG; Poley JW; Loeve AJ; Severin JA; Abel LF; Smit BJ; de Goeij I; Vos MC Endoscopy; 2015 Jun; 47(6):493-502. PubMed ID: 25826278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an overnight non-culture test for detection of viable Gram-negative bacteria in endoscope channels. Singh H; Duerksen DR; Schultz G; Reidy C; DeGagne P; Olson N; Nugent Z; Alfa MJ Endosc Int Open; 2019 Feb; 7(2):E268-E273. PubMed ID: 30705961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning. Alfa MJ; Degagne P; Olson N Am J Infect Control; 1999 Oct; 27(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 10511485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscope sampling and culturing methods. Pineau L; Alfa M; Radix C J Hosp Infect; 2024 Jul; 149():36-45. PubMed ID: 38649121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Duodenoscope Reprocessing Surveillance Methods. De Wolfe TJ; Safdar N; Meller M; Marx J; Pfau PR; Nelsen EM; Benson ME; Soni A; Reichelderfer M; Duster M; Gopal DV Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019; 2019():1959141. PubMed ID: 31828050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]