230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29164328)
1. Metallosis after traumatic loosening of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review.
Yang CC; Tang CL; Tzeng CY; Tsou HK
Eur Spine J; 2018 Jul; 27(Suppl 3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29164328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review.
Cavanaugh DA; Nunley PD; Kerr EJ; Werner DJ; Jawahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):E262-5. PubMed ID: 19333091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.
Yoon DH; Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Kim SH
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Sep; 148(9):943-50. PubMed ID: 16791434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
Heller JG; Sasso RC; Papadopoulos SM; Anderson PA; Fessler RG; Hacker RJ; Coric D; Cauthen JC; Riew DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 19112337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologically documented adjacent-segment degeneration after cervical arthroplasty: characteristics and review of cases.
Yi S; Lee DY; Ahn PG; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Shin HC
Surg Neurol; 2009 Oct; 72(4):325-9; discussion 329. PubMed ID: 19665192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Lei T; Liu Y; Wang H; Xu J; Ma Q; Wang L; Shen Y
Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 26744166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical research of dynamic cervical implant and cage fusion in two-level cervical disc protrusion].
Si W; Zhang H; Wang A; Sun Y; Bai Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 28(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 24693781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: survivorship analysis of Bryan disc for single-level cervical arthroplasty.
Chung SB; Muradov JM; Lee SH; Eoh W; Kim ES
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 22421919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes.
Aragonés M; Hevia E; Barrios C
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2735-45. PubMed ID: 26363559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report.
Bartels RH; Donk R
Neurosurgery; 2005 Jul; 57(1):E194; discussion E194. PubMed ID: 15987559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant failure of Bryan cervical disc due to broken polyurethane sheath: a case report.
Fan H; Wu S; Wu Z; Wang Z; Guo Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E814-6. PubMed ID: 22210017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early failure of metal-on-metal artificial disc prostheses associated with lymphocytic reaction: diagnosis and treatment experience in four cases.
Guyer RD; Shellock J; MacLennan B; Hanscom D; Knight RQ; McCombe P; Jacobs JJ; Urban RM; Bradford D; Ohnmeiss DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E492-7. PubMed ID: 21252827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical disc replacement C5-6.
Bonkowski J; Avadhani A; Manu A; Rajasekaran S
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):345-6. PubMed ID: 20130928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Mummaneni PV; Burkus JK; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Zdeblick TA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 17355018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
