244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2916435)
1. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography.
Klinke WP; Grace M; Miller R; Naqvi SZ; Roth D; Roy L
Clin Cardiol; 1989 Dec; 12(12):689-96. PubMed ID: 2692891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Miller R; Knudtson M; Robb J; Dragatakis L; Browne KF; Vetrovec G; Smith SC
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 19(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 1552109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between a low-osmolar ionic (ioxaglate) and a low-osmolar non-ionic (iopamidol) contrast agent in cardiac imaging.
Scholtz ME; Svatos VJ; Myburgh DP
S Afr Med J; 1988 Feb; 73(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 3340942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J
Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are ioxaglate and iopamidol equally safe and well tolerated in cardiac angiography? A randomized, double-blind clinical study.
Piscione F; Focaccio A; Santinelli V; De Paola M; Villari B; Spinazzi A; Condorelli M; Chiariello M
Am Heart J; 1990 Nov; 120(5):1130-6. PubMed ID: 2239665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of iodixanol (Visipaque) and ioxaglate (Hexabrix) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a double-blind randomized study].
Roriz R; de Gevigney G; Finet G; Nantois-Collet C; Borch KW; Amiel M; Beaune J
J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 80(7):727-32. PubMed ID: 10431273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allergic-type adverse reactions to low osmolality contrast media in patients with a history of allergy or asthma.
Simon MR
Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 7558732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac hemodynamic effects of iodixanol, iopamidol, and ioxaglate following left coronary injections in anesthetized dogs.
Morris TW; Dukovic D; Pagani E
Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9419521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ
Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
Vik-Mo H; Følling M; Barth P; Nordrehaug JE; Bjørkhaug A; Rosland GA
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison.
Fattori R; Piva R; Schicchi F; Pancrazi A; Gabrielli G; Marzocchi A; Piovaccari G; Blandini A; Magnani B
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 8020520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary arteriography. A crossover study in children.
Saito H; Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Yamagami H; Kamiya T
Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):910-3. PubMed ID: 3203992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty.
Schräder R; Esch I; Ensslen R; Fach WA; Merle H; Scherer D; Sievert H; Spies HF; Zeplin HE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 9973019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study.
Salem DN; Konstam MA; Isner JM; Bonin JD
Am Heart J; 1986 Mar; 111(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 3006464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340, ioxaglate 320, and iodixanol 320 in cardiac catheterization.
Sutton AG; Finn P; Grech ED; Hall JA; Stewart MJ; Davies A; de Belder MA
Am Heart J; 2001 Apr; 141(4):677-83. PubMed ID: 11275937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
Cooper MW; Reed PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
