193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29164529)
1. Open season: positive changes for increased transparency in the biomedical literature.
Jones PM; Bryson GL
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 65(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 29164529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
Barreiro E
Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Data publishing and scientific journals: the future of the scientific paper in a world of shared data.
De Schutter E
Neuroinformatics; 2010 Oct; 8(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 20835853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The FEBS Journal in 2020: Open Access and quality versus quantity publishing.
Martin SJ
FEBS J; 2020 Jan; 287(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 31904913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New happenings at the NIH.
Kennedy DN
Neuroinformatics; 2008; 6(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 18604608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predatory Journals Threaten the Quality of Published Medical Research.
Beall J
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Jan; 47(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 28042746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.
Vinny PW; Vishnu VY; Lal V
J Neurol Sci; 2016 Apr; 363():119-20. PubMed ID: 27000235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. JMT's Research Concepts Section: a 5-Year Evaluation.
Jang DH; Love JS; Mycyk MB
J Med Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 15(4):226-227. PubMed ID: 31385195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Change and continuity.
Lohmander S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2008 Jul; 16(7):741. PubMed ID: 18562220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The open access movement: a chance to re-evaluate the peer review process?
de Granda-Orive JI; Segrelles-Calvo G; García-Río F
Arch Bronconeumol; 2015 Mar; 51(3):157-8. PubMed ID: 24928305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Publish and be damned: the damage being created by predatory publishing.
Wallace WA
Bone Joint J; 2019 May; 101-B(5):500-501. PubMed ID: 31038353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased transparency: making the journal better for readers and for authors.
Doyle V; Schachat AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1443-4. PubMed ID: 18762071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Salami slicing.
Gray R; Baker C
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2016 Nov; 23(9-10):541-542. PubMed ID: 27620457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Are you also overwhelmed by the predators?
Fitzpatrick JJ
Appl Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 39():270. PubMed ID: 29422172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Correcting honest pervasive errors in the scientific literature: Retractions without stigma.
Baskin PK; Mink JW; Gross RA
Neurology; 2017 Jul; 89(1):11-13. PubMed ID: 28674155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Here/In this issue and there/abstract thinking: how do we know what we know? Cautionary tales in medical publishing.
Sassi RB
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2014 Jan; 53(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24342378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
