291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2916470)
1. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
Valant JR; Sinclair PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of combination second molar extraction and functional appliance therapy.
Whitney EF; Sinclair PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Mar; 91(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 3469904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.
Hamilton SD; Sinclair PM; Hamilton RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Nov; 92(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 3479011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of Fränkel II treatment on arch width and arch perimeter.
McWade RA; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Oct; 92(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 3477950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric changes in Class II, Division 1 cases after orthopedic treatment with the bioactivator.
Dahan J; Serhal JB; Englebert A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 2916469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
Derringer K
Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
Vargervik K; Harvold EP
Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Arch width development in Class II patients treated with the Fränkel appliance.
McDougall PD; McNamara JA; Dierkes JM
Am J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 82(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 6760718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
Wieslander L
Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.
Pancherz H; Fackel U
Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 2351206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance.
Pancherz H; Hägg U
Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
