These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture. Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations. Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population. Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep. Vahedi SM; Salek Ardetani S; Brito LF; Karimi K; Pahlavan Afshari K; Banabazi MH BMC Genomics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):335. PubMed ID: 37330501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population. Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighting Strategies for Single-Step Genomic BLUP: An Iterative Approach for Accurate Calculation of GEBV and GWAS. Zhang X; Lourenco D; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Misztal I Front Genet; 2016; 7():151. PubMed ID: 27594861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle. Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations. Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models. Yang W; Chen C; Tempelman RJ Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):13. PubMed ID: 25885894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP. van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction. Gowane GR; Lee SH; Clark S; Moghaddar N; Al-Mamun HA; van der Werf JHJ J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Sep; 136(5):390-407. PubMed ID: 31215699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium. Nishio M; Satoh M J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of iterated single-step and Bayesian regressions on genomic evaluations for age at 100 kg in swine. Freitas MS; Freitas LS; Weber T; Yamaki M; Cantão ME; Peixoto JO; Ledur MC J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4675-83. PubMed ID: 26523560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. Habier D; Fernando RL; Kizilkaya K; Garrick DJ BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():186. PubMed ID: 21605355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances. Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables. Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Important Economic Traits of Cashmere and Meat Goats Assessed by Simulation Study. Yan X; Zhang T; Liu L; Yu Y; Yang G; Han Y; Gong G; Wang F; Zhang L; Liu H; Li W; Yan X; Mao H; Li Y; Du C; Li J; Zhang Y; Wang R; Lv Q; Wang Z; Zhang J; Liu Z; Wang Z; Su R Front Vet Sci; 2022; 9():770539. PubMed ID: 35372544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs. Yin C; Zhou P; Wang Y; Yin Z; Liu Y Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101062. PubMed ID: 38211414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]