735 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29168984)
1. Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Khan SU; Lone AN; Saleem MA; Kaluski E
Clin Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 40(11):974-981. PubMed ID: 29168984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
Kolte D; Vlahakes GJ; Palacios IF; Sakhuja R; Passeri JJ; Inglessis I; Elmariah S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 74(12):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 31537261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low to moderate surgical risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
Elmaraezy A; Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Eltoomy M; Saad S; Negida A; Abdelaty OM; Abdallah AR; Aboelfotoh AM; Hassan HM; Elmaraezy AG; Morsi M; Althaher F; Althaher M; AlSafadi AM
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Aug; 17(1):234. PubMed ID: 28836953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Garg A; Rao SV; Visveswaran G; Agrawal S; Sharma A; Garg L; Mahata I; Garg J; Singal D; Cohen M; Kostis JB
J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):209-216. PubMed ID: 28570236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-Year Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in a Real World Population.
Barbanti M; Tamburino C; D'Errigo P; Biancari F; Ranucci M; Rosato S; Santoro G; Fusco D; Seccareccia F;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007825. PubMed ID: 31284737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.
Ando T; Akintoye E; Telila T; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Schreiber T; Afonso L; Grines CL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):813-819. PubMed ID: 28990736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.
Garcia S; Kelly R; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Yannopoulos D; Adabag S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 29316204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Conte JV; Hermiller J; Resar JR; Deeb GM; Gleason TG; Adams DH; Popma JJ; Yakubov SJ; Watson D; Guo J; Zorn GL; Reardon MJ
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29195573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-Risk Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Anantha-Narayanan M; Kandasamy VV; Reddy YN; Megaly M; Baskaran J; Pershad A; Suri RM; Garcia S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):441-452. PubMed ID: 31678116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- and intermediate-risk patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ueshima D; Fovino LN; D'Amico G; Brener SJ; Esposito G; Tarantini G
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2019 Jul; 34(3):216-225. PubMed ID: 30232711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
