186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29169313)
1. Effect of Time-of-Flight and Regularized Reconstructions on Quantitative Measurements and Qualitative Assessments in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer With
Behr SC; Mollard BJ; Yang J; Flavell RR; Hawkins RA; Seo Y
Mol Imaging; 2017; 16():1536012117736703. PubMed ID: 29169313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative comparison between regularized time-of-flight and OSEM PET reconstructions for small 18F-FDG-avid lesions.
Chism CB; Ravizzini GC; Macapinlac HA; Pan T
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 28383318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of MRI-assisted metabolic volumetric parameters provided by simultaneous (18)F-fluorocholine PET/MRI for primary prostate cancer characterization.
Kim YI; Cheon GJ; Paeng JC; Cho JY; Kwak C; Kang KW; Chung JK; Kim EE; Lee DS
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1247-56. PubMed ID: 25759164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F choline PET/CT using time-of-flight reconstruction algorithm in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence.
Hausmann D; Bittencourt LK; Attenberger UI; Sertdemir M; Weidner A; Büsing KA; Brade J; Wenz F; Schoenberg SO; Dinter DJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2014 Mar; 39(3):e197-201. PubMed ID: 24092230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Clinical and Experimental Comparison of Time of Flight PET/MRI and PET/CT Systems.
Oprea-Lager DE; Yaqub M; Pieters IC; Reinhard R; van Moorselaar RJ; van den Eertwegh AJ; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Oct; 17(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25690949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Localization of primary prostate cancer with dual-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET.
Kwee SA; Wei H; Sesterhenn I; Yun D; Coel MN
J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 16455632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The assessment of time-of-flight on image quality and quantification with reduced administered activity and scan times in 18F-FDG PET.
Armstrong IS; James JM; Williams HA; Kelly MD; Matthews JC
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jul; 36(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 25757197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Choi JY; Yang J; Noworolski SM; Behr S; Chang AJ; Simko JP; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J; Seo Y
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 27513849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Various β Values on Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements in 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Images Reconstructed With a Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm.
Baratto L; Duan H; Ferri V; Khalighi M; Iagaru A
Clin Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 45(7):506-513. PubMed ID: 32433170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR-based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI.
Leynes AP; Yang J; Shanbhag DD; Kaushik SS; Seo Y; Hope TA; Wiesinger F; Larson PE
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):902-913. PubMed ID: 28112410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
