These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29169313)

  • 1. Effect of Time-of-Flight and Regularized Reconstructions on Quantitative Measurements and Qualitative Assessments in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer With
    Behr SC; Mollard BJ; Yang J; Flavell RR; Hawkins RA; Seo Y
    Mol Imaging; 2017; 16():1536012117736703. PubMed ID: 29169313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
    Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
    Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative comparison between regularized time-of-flight and OSEM PET reconstructions for small 18F-FDG-avid lesions.
    Chism CB; Ravizzini GC; Macapinlac HA; Pan T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 28383318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
    Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Various β Values on Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements in 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Images Reconstructed With a Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm.
    Baratto L; Duan H; Ferri V; Khalighi M; Iagaru A
    Clin Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 45(7):506-513. PubMed ID: 32433170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of image metrics for reduced and standard dose pediatric
    Zucchetta P; Branchini M; Zorz A; Bodanza V; Cecchin D; Paiusco M; Bui F
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 92(1095):20180438. PubMed ID: 30673306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Svirydenka H; Muehlematter UJ; Nagel HW; Delso G; Ferraro DA; Kudura K; Burger IA; Ter Voert EEGW
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3188-3197. PubMed ID: 32060711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
    Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
    Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Clinical and Experimental Comparison of Time of Flight PET/MRI and PET/CT Systems.
    Oprea-Lager DE; Yaqub M; Pieters IC; Reinhard R; van Moorselaar RJ; van den Eertwegh AJ; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Oct; 17(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25690949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
    Mehranian A; Zaidi H
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of MRI-assisted metabolic volumetric parameters provided by simultaneous (18)F-fluorocholine PET/MRI for primary prostate cancer characterization.
    Kim YI; Cheon GJ; Paeng JC; Cho JY; Kwak C; Kang KW; Chung JK; Kim EE; Lee DS
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1247-56. PubMed ID: 25759164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced count pediatric whole-body
    Alves VPV; Ata NA; MacLean J; Sharp SE; Li Y; Brady S; Trout AT
    Pediatr Radiol; 2024 Jan; 54(1):170-180. PubMed ID: 37962603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
    Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
    Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes of [
    Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Including Bone in Dixon-Based Attenuation Correction for
    Elschot M; Selnæs KM; Johansen H; Krüger-Stokke B; Bertilsson H; Bathen TF
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1913-1917. PubMed ID: 29728516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.