382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29169315)
21. Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.
Buss E; Hodge SE; Calandruccio L; Leibold LJ; Grose JH
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 30601213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Corbin NE; Bonino AY; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Roverud E; Clayton KK; Best V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):132. PubMed ID: 27475139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.
Calandruccio L; Brouwer S; Van Engen KJ; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 23800811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
Chen J; Li H; Li L; Wu X; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does visual speech provide release from perceptual masking in children?
Halverson DM; Lalonde K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):EL221. PubMed ID: 33003896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of target-masker sex mismatch on linguistic release from masking.
Williams BT; Viswanathan N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):2006. PubMed ID: 33138488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of Second Language Proficiency and Linguistic Uncertainty on Recognition of Speech in Native and Nonnative Competing Speech.
Francis AL; Tigchelaar LJ; Zhang R; Zekveld AA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1815-1830. PubMed ID: 29971338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.
Carlile S; Corkhill C
Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():8662. PubMed ID: 25727100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.
Wightman FL; Kistler DJ; O'Bryan A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 20649222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
