These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29169397)

  • 1. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
    Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
    Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
    Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stakeholder Engagement in Designing Attributes for a Discrete Choice Experiment With Policy Implications: An Example of 2 Swiss Studies on Healthcare Delivery.
    Föhn Z; Nicolet A; Marti J; Kaufmann C; Balthasar A
    Value Health; 2023 Jun; 26(6):925-933. PubMed ID: 36646277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
    Williams G; Kinchin I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
    Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
    Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
    Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring trade-offs in nephrology: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies.
    Clark MD; Szczepura A; Gumber A; Howard K; Moro D; Morton RL
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2018 Feb; 33(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 28158746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
    Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes.
    Janssen EM; Segal JB; Bridges JF
    Patient; 2016 Oct; 9(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 27120338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
    Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
    Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Jonker MF; Stolk EA
    Patient; 2015 Oct; 8(5):373-84. PubMed ID: 25726010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.