These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2916969)

  • 1. Automated perimetry. How do we interpret the results?
    Wilensky JT
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 107(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 2916969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How long will automated perimetry remain standard practice?
    Gutteridge IF
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Mar; 88(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 15807637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Alward WL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 10755955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors that influence automated perimetry.
    Fingeret M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7018. PubMed ID: 23047719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervision during automated perimetry.
    Sisto D
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Aug; 107(8):1438-9. PubMed ID: 10919881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on automated perimetry papers.
    Keltner JL
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1317-9. PubMed ID: 233863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?
    O'Brien C; Wild JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 79(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 7703193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supervision during automated perimetry.
    Johnson LN; Sassani JW; Aminlari A
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Aug; 107(8):1439-40. PubMed ID: 10919883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated visual field plotters vs tangent screen kinetic perimetry.
    Gerber DS; Brothers DM; Erickson RC; Sprotzer SP; Farrell G
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 May; 98(5):930-2. PubMed ID: 7378015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 7710398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of confrontation visual field tests.
    Prasad S; Cohen AB
    Neurology; 2011 Mar; 76(13):1192-3; author reply 1193. PubMed ID: 21444908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.
    Riemann CD; Hanson S; Foster JA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 118(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10636416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perimetry.
    Ellenberger C
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1977; 17(1):85-113. PubMed ID: 844961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold perimetry of each eye with both eyes open in patients with monocular functional (nonorganic) and organic vision loss.
    Hoffman DJ; Wilson R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Feb; 127(2):242-3. PubMed ID: 10030586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.