These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29170405)

  • 1. The Robustness and the Doubly-Preferential Attachment Simulation of the Consensus Connectome Dynamics of the Human Brain.
    Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16118. PubMed ID: 29170405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to Direct the Edges of the Connectomes: Dynamics of the Consensus Connectomes and the Development of the Connections in the Human Brain.
    Kerepesi C; Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158680. PubMed ID: 27362431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The dorsal striatum and the dynamics of the consensus connectomes in the frontal lobe of the human brain.
    Kerepesi C; Varga B; Szalkai B; Grolmusz V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 673():51-55. PubMed ID: 29496609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution directed human connectomes and the Consensus Connectome Dynamics.
    Szalkai B; Kerepesi C; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215473. PubMed ID: 30990832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parameterizable consensus connectomes from the Human Connectome Project: the Budapest Reference Connectome Server v3.0.
    Szalkai B; Kerepesi C; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2017 Feb; 11(1):113-116. PubMed ID: 28174617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Budapest Reference Connectome Server v2.0.
    Szalkai B; Kerepesi C; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 May; 595():60-2. PubMed ID: 25862487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The significance of negative correlations in brain connectivity.
    Zhan L; Jenkins LM; Wolfson OE; GadElkarim JJ; Nocito K; Thompson PM; Ajilore OA; Chung MK; Leow AD
    J Comp Neurol; 2017 Oct; 525(15):3251-3265. PubMed ID: 28675490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constraints and spandrels of interareal connectomes.
    Rubinov M
    Nat Commun; 2016 Dec; 7():13812. PubMed ID: 27924867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich-clubs.
    Zamora-López G; Chen Y; Deco G; Kringelbach ML; Zhou C
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38424. PubMed ID: 27917958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping correlations of psychological and structural connectome properties of the dataset of the human connectome project with the maximum spanning tree method.
    Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2019 Oct; 13(5):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 30088220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thresholding functional connectomes by means of mixture modeling.
    Bielczyk NZ; Walocha F; Ebel PW; Haak KV; Llera A; Buitelaar JK; Glennon JC; Beckmann CF
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 171():402-414. PubMed ID: 29309896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Frequent Network Neighborhood Mapping of the human hippocampus shows much more frequent neighbor sets in males than in females.
    Fellner M; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227910. PubMed ID: 31990956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional Geometry of Human Connectomes.
    Tadić B; Andjelković M; Melnik R
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12060. PubMed ID: 31427676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep learning models of cognitive processes constrained by human brain connectomes.
    Zhang Y; Farrugia N; Bellec P
    Med Image Anal; 2022 Aug; 80():102507. PubMed ID: 35738052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strong-Weak Pruning for Brain Network Identification in Connectome-Wide Neuroimaging: Application to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease Stage Characterization.
    Serra A; Galdi P; Pesce E; Fratello M; Trojsi F; Tedeschi G; Tagliaferri R; Esposito F
    Int J Neural Syst; 2019 Sep; 29(7):1950007. PubMed ID: 30929575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome.
    Haimovici A; Tagliazucchi E; Balenzuela P; Chialvo DR
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Apr; 110(17):178101. PubMed ID: 23679783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain.
    Owen JP; Ziv E; Bukshpun P; Pojman N; Wakahiro M; Berman JI; Roberts TP; Friedman EJ; Sherr EH; Mukherjee P
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(2):160-76. PubMed ID: 23350832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specificity and robustness of long-distance connections in weighted, interareal connectomes.
    Betzel RF; Bassett DS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):E4880-E4889. PubMed ID: 29739890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The frequent complete subgraphs in the human connectome.
    Fellner M; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236883. PubMed ID: 32817642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graph analysis of the human connectome: promise, progress, and pitfalls.
    Fornito A; Zalesky A; Breakspear M
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 80():426-44. PubMed ID: 23643999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.