These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Biologic evaluation of filling materials. A comparison of results using cell culture techniques, implantation tests and pulp studies. Mjör IA; Hensten-Pettersen A; Skogedal O Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 407166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dehydration of dentin by some restorative materials. Johnson G; Brännström M J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Sep; 26(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 5284185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal. Cox CF; Sübay RK; Suzuki S; Suzuki SH; Ostro E Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 9084310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reactions of dentin and pulp to drugs and restorative materials. Frank RM J Dent Res; 1975 Jun; 54 Spec No B():B176-87. PubMed ID: 1094043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulp response in the rhesus monkey to "composite" dental restorative materials in unlined cavities. Rao SR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1971 May; 31(5):676-88. PubMed ID: 4995487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and microscopic pulp response to a composite restorative material. Dickey DM; el-Kafrawy AH; Mitchell DF J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Jan; 88(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 4588259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulp reactions to anterior restorative materials. Stanley HR; Swerdlow H; Buonocore MG J Am Dent Assoc; 1967 Jul; 75(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 5229555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. BIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE SELECTION AND USE OF RESTORATIVE MATERIALS. MASLER M Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():131-47. PubMed ID: 14276021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Histopathological study of a quartz-filled composite dental restorative material. Adams RJ; Lord GH J Dent Res; 1973; 52(2):362-5. PubMed ID: 4347830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response of the pulp and dentin to contract with filling materials. Avery JK J Dent Res; 1975 Jun; 54 Spec No B():B188-97. PubMed ID: 805800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of four restorative materials assessed by changes in enzyme levels in two cell types. Meryon SD; Riches DW J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 6213626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Zirconia-incorporated zinc oxide eugenol has improved mechanical properties and cytocompatibility with human dental pulp stem cells. Jun SK; Kim HW; Lee HH; Lee JH Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):132-142. PubMed ID: 29037476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of four dental materials in vitro assessed by cell viability and enzyme cytochemistry. Meryon SD; Browne RM J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Jul; 10(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 6577162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biologic effects of dental materials. 2. Toxicity of anterior tooth restorative materials on HeLa cells in vitro. Spangberg L; Rodrigues H; Langeland L; Langeland K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1973 Nov; 36(5):713-24. PubMed ID: 4518036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathologic response of the human dental pulp to restorative resins. Suarez CL; Stanley HR; Gilmore HW J Am Dent Assoc; 1970 Apr; 80(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 4907040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]