These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29171886)

  • 1. Reproductive Rights without Resources or Recourse.
    Mutcherson K
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Dec; 47 Suppl 3():S12-S18. PubMed ID: 29171886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom.
    Lombardo PA
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9068235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Against procreative moral rights.
    Earl J
    Bioethics; 2022 Jun; 36(5):569-575. PubMed ID: 34908181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Substantial Shifts in Supreme Court Health Law Jurisprudence.
    Gostin LO; Hodge JG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1431-1432. PubMed ID: 30193377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right to procreate and in utero fetal therapy.
    Robertson JA
    J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):333-66. PubMed ID: 6983547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to procreate: the dilemma of overpopulation and the United States judiciary.
    Bolner J; Jacobsen R
    Loyola Law Rev; 1979; 25(2):235-62. PubMed ID: 11661912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Welcome to the wild west: protecting access to cross border fertility care in the United States.
    Mutcherson KM
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2012; 22(2):349-393.. PubMed ID: 25330565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life-term inmates' right to procreate via artificial insemination: why so much fuss over the contents of a plastic cup?
    Harrington LS
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2002; 33(3):521-49. PubMed ID: 16493804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Constitution.
    Coleman CH
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 15868662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When religious freedom clashes with access to care.
    Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Curfman GD
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(7):596-9. PubMed ID: 24988298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association.
    Ikemoto LC
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The constitutional question of cloning humans: duplication or procreation? An examination of the constitutional right to procreate.
    Kalebic C
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1998; 8(1):229-84. PubMed ID: 15098541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive rights and responsibilities.
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 8088995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right to found a family as a stillborn right to procreate?
    Eijkholt M
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 20513794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.