These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29172585)

  • 1. An eye-tracking examination of readers' sensitivity to pragmatic scope information during the processing of conditional inducements.
    Wood JS; Haigh M; Stewart AJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 72(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 29172585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "This Isn't a Promise, It's a Threat".
    Wood JS; Haigh M; Stewart AJ
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 27221599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conditional advice and inducements: are readers sensitive to implicit speech acts during comprehension?
    Haigh M; Stewart AJ; Wood JS; Connell L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 21334582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to speaker control in the online comprehension of conditional tips and promises: an eye-tracking study.
    Stewart AJ; Haigh M; Ferguson HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1022-36. PubMed ID: 23356237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An eye-tracking investigation into readers' sensitivity to actual versus expected utility in the comprehension of conditionals.
    Haigh M; Ferguson HJ; Stewart AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):166-85. PubMed ID: 23710889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context.
    Čšurcan A; Filik R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1867-1893. PubMed ID: 27504677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A cross-sectional study.
    Yan M; Pan J; Kliegl R
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Nov; 55(11):2275-2285. PubMed ID: 31535894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pragmatic influences on sentence integration: Evidence from eye movements.
    Chen L; Paterson KB; Li X; Li L; Yang Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2742-2751. PubMed ID: 31184264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.
    Veldre A; Drieghe D; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1612-1628. PubMed ID: 28414501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The repeated name penalty effect in children's natural reading: Evidence from eye tracking.
    Eilers S; Tiffin-Richards SP; Schroeder S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):403-412. PubMed ID: 29350582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
    White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.
    Lowder MW; Gordon PC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1733-8. PubMed ID: 25962686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
    Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading.
    Titone D; Lovseth K; Kasparian K; Tiv M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Dec; 73(4):216-230. PubMed ID: 31192627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing Control Information in a Nominal Control Construction: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Aug; 45(4):779-93. PubMed ID: 25980968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognate effects on anaphor processing.
    Lauro J; Schwartz AI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):381-396. PubMed ID: 29999399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. I "hear" what you're "saying": Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension.
    Zhou P; Christianson K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):972-95. PubMed ID: 25679796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing Conditional Perfection in Promises and Threats: The Role of Negation, Clause Order and Incentive.
    Zevakhina N; Prigorkina V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Dec; 50(6):1557-1573. PubMed ID: 34331178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking.
    Vasilev MR; Liversedge SP; Rowan D; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1484-1512. PubMed ID: 31436455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.