These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29172790)

  • 1. Detection and reaction thresholds for reverse alarms in noise with and without passive hearing protection.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Roy K; Pageot LP; Nélisse H; Ellaham N; Nassrallah F
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S51-S60. PubMed ID: 29172790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory backup alarms: distance-at-first-detection via in-situ experimentation on alarm design and hearing protection effects.
    Alali K; Casali JG
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3599-607. PubMed ID: 22317269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Augmented warning sound detection for hearing protectors.
    Bernstein ER; Brammer AJ; Yu G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL29-34. PubMed ID: 24437853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4446. PubMed ID: 25669256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adversarial relationship between combined medial olivocochlear (MOC) and middle-ear-muscle (MEM) reflexes and alarm-in-noise detection thresholds under negative signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
    Karunarathne B; Wang T; So RHY; Kam ACS; Meddis R
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():124-128. PubMed ID: 30107299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of electronic ANR and conventional hearing protectors on vehicle backup alarm detection in noise.
    Casali JG; Robinson GS; Dabney EC; Gauger D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15151152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
    Sommers MS; Gehr SE
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication in noise with acoustic and electronic hearing protection devices.
    Plyler PN; Klumpp ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Jul; 14(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 12956309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infants' sensitivity to broadband noise.
    Werner LA; Boike K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2103-11. PubMed ID: 11386562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audibility of reverse alarms under hearing protectors for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2281-99. PubMed ID: 7498188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time and frequency metrics related to auditory masking of a 10 kHz tone in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).
    Branstetter BK; Trickey JS; Aihara H; Finneran JJ; Liberman TR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4556. PubMed ID: 25669265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of warble tones in wideband noise with and without hearing protection devices.
    Letowski T; McGee L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 8304681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of sound propagation and perception of three types of backup alarms with regards to worker safety.
    Vaillancourt V; Nélisse H; Laroche C; Giguére C; Boutin J; Laferriére P
    Noise Health; 2013; 15(67):420-36. PubMed ID: 24231421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.