These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29172861)

  • 1. The benefits of sequential testing: Improved diagnostic accuracy and better outcomes for failing students.
    Homer M; Fuller R; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2018 Mar; 40(3):275-284. PubMed ID: 29172861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advancing the objective structured clinical examination: sequential testing in theory and practice.
    Pell G; Fuller R; Homer M; Roberts T
    Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 23662874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is short-term remediation after OSCE failure sustained? A retrospective analysis of the longitudinal attainment of underperforming students in OSCE assessments.
    Pell G; Fuller R; Homer M; Roberts T
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 22288992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Problematizing the concept of the "borderline" group in performance assessments.
    Homer M; Pell G; Fuller R
    Med Teach; 2017 May; 39(5):469-475. PubMed ID: 28440718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
    Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential testing in a high stakes OSCE: Determining number of screening tests.
    Currie GP; Sivasubramaniam S; Cleland J
    Med Teach; 2016 Jul; 38(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 26474117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.
    Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings.
    Bernard AW; Ceccolini G; Feinn R; Rockfeld J; Rosenberg I; Thomas L; Cassese T
    Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1324718. PubMed ID: 28521646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students.
    Williams RG; Klamen DL
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1008-14. PubMed ID: 22722355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reflection as a strategy to foster medical students' acquisition of diagnostic competence.
    Mamede S; van Gog T; Moura AS; de Faria RM; Peixoto JM; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):464-72. PubMed ID: 22515754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
    Hays R; Gupta TS; Veitch J
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):810-5. PubMed ID: 18564094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores.
    Simon SR; Bui A; Day S; Berti D; Volkan K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 18070260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating patient partner scores into high stakes assessment: an observational study into opinions and attitudes.
    Thomson FC; MacKenzie RK; Anderson M; Denison AR; Currie GP
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):214. PubMed ID: 29141624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interactive examination: assessing students' self-assessment ability.
    Mattheos N; Nattestad A; Falk-Nilsson E; Attström R
    Med Educ; 2004 Apr; 38(4):378-89. PubMed ID: 15025639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.
    Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician.
    Shumway JM; Harden RM;
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):569-84. PubMed ID: 15369904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of OSCE design on students' diagnostic reasoning.
    Lafleur A; Côté L; Leppink J
    Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 49(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 25626751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Score Reflect the Clinical Reasoning Ability of Medical Students?
    Park WB; Kang SH; Lee YS; Myung SJ
    Am J Med Sci; 2015 Jul; 350(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 25647834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.