These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29173122)
1. Are Study and Journal Characteristics Reliable Indicators of "Truth" in Imaging Research? Frank RA; McInnes MDF; Levine D; Kressel HY; Jesurum JS; Petrcich W; McGrath TA; Bossuyt PM Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):215-223. PubMed ID: 29173122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Citation bias in imaging research: are studies with higher diagnostic accuracy estimates cited more often? Frank RA; Sharifabadi AD; Salameh JP; McGrath TA; Kraaijpoel N; Dang W; Li N; Gauthier ID; Wu MZ; Bossuyt PM; Levine D; McInnes MDF Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 30443756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy. McGrath TA; McInnes MD; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PM Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27082781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? Choi YJ; Chung MS; Koo HJ; Park JE; Yoon HM; Park SH Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):706-14. PubMed ID: 27587959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate? Dilauro M; McInnes MD; Korevaar DA; van der Pol CB; Petrcich W; Walther S; Quon J; Kurowecki D; Bossuyt PM Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26836050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015. Hong PJ; Korevaar DA; McGrath TA; Ziai H; Frank R; Alabousi M; Bossuyt PMM; McInnes MDF J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):523-544. PubMed ID: 28640484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication--before-and-after study. Wilczynski NL Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):817-23. PubMed ID: 18710977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin". Ochodo EA; de Haan MC; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 23360738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability? Alabousi M; Alabousi A; McGrath TA; Cobey KD; Budhram B; Frank RA; Nguyen F; Salameh JP; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; McInnes MDF Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 30051140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Chen H; Chen CH; Jhanji V Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23623355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal. Nielsen MB; Seitz K Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria. Maclean EN; Stone IS; Ceelen F; Garcia-Albeniz X; Sommer WH; Petersen SE Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 24459243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compliance with STARD checklist among studies of coronary CT angiography: systematic review. Walther S; Schueler S; Tackmann R; Schuetz GM; Schlattmann P; Dewey M Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 24475846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are methodological quality and completeness of reporting associated with citation-based measures of publication impact? A secondary analysis of a systematic review of dementia biomarker studies. Mackinnon S; Drozdowska BA; Hamilton M; Noel-Storr AH; McShane R; Quinn T BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020331. PubMed ID: 29572396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative. Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research. Prager R; Bowdridge J; Kareemi H; Wright C; McGrath TA; McInnes MDF JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e203871. PubMed ID: 32356885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Highly cited works in radiology: the top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Pagni M; Khan NR; Cohen HL; Choudhri AF Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1056-66. PubMed ID: 24833569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]