441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29173123)
1. Screening Digital Mammography Recall Rate: Does It Change with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Experience?
DiPrete O; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):838-844. PubMed ID: 29173123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Synthesized Mammography: The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
Ambinder EB; Harvey SC; Panigrahi B; Li X; Woods RW
Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):973-976. PubMed ID: 29395801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.
Aujero MP; Gavenonis SC; Benjamin R; Zhang Z; Holt JS
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 28221096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.
Sharpe RE; Venkataraman S; Phillips J; Dialani V; Fein-Zachary VJ; Prakash S; Slanetz PJ; Mehta TS
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 26458206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience.
Bernstein MH; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 35014905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
Sprague BL; Coley RY; Kerlikowske K; Rauscher GH; Henderson LM; Onega T; Lee CI; Herschorn SD; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e201759. PubMed ID: 32227180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium.
Conant EF; Beaber EF; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Onega T; Tosteson AN; McCarthy AM; Poplack SP; Haas JS; Armstrong K; Schnall MD; Barlow WE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 156(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 26931450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Radiologist Learning Curve.
Miglioretti DL; Abraham L; Lee CI; Buist DSM; Herschorn SD; Sprague BL; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K;
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 30806595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings.
Conant EF; Talley MM; Parghi CR; Sheh BC; Liang SY; Pohlman S; Rane A; Jung Y; Stevens LAS; Paulus JK; Alsheik N
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(3):e221571. PubMed ID: 36916891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lourenco AP; Barry-Brooks M; Baird GL; Tuttle A; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 25247407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis - 4 year experience and comparison with national data.
Pan HB; Wong KF; Yao A; Hsu GC; Chou CP; Liang HL; Huang JS; Li HJ; Wang SC; Yang TL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 81(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 29129518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
