These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29173141)

  • 1. Too Tasty to Be Ignored.
    Dummel S; Hübner R
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 64(5):338-345. PubMed ID: 29173141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional biases to foods: The effects of caloric content and cognitive restraint.
    Forestell CA; Lau P; Gyurovski II; Dickter CL; Haque SS
    Appetite; 2012 Dec; 59(3):748-54. PubMed ID: 22800656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):577-601. PubMed ID: 16104096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control of Attention in Rhesus Monkeys Measured Using a Flanker Task.
    Hassett TC; Hampton RR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2155-2166. PubMed ID: 35174464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative reinforcing value of sweet versus savory snack foods after consumption of sugar- or non-nutritive sweetened beverages.
    Casperson SL; Johnson L; Roemmich JN
    Appetite; 2017 May; 112():143-149. PubMed ID: 28126491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Servant M; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map.
    Pearson D; Osborn R; Whitford TJ; Failing M; Theeuwes J; Le Pelley ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2226-40. PubMed ID: 27184056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adding a reward increases the reinforcing value of fruit.
    De Cock N; Vervoort L; Kolsteren P; Huybregts L; Van Lippevelde W; Vangeel J; Notebaert M; Beullens K; Goossens L; Maes L; Deforche B; Braet C; Eggermont S; Van Camp J; Lachat C
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Feb; 117(4):611-620. PubMed ID: 28382893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A flanker effect for moving visual stimuli.
    Lange-Malecki B; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():134-8. PubMed ID: 22811985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual grouping of objects occupied by target and flankers affects target-flanker interference.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 26404531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
    Cosman JD; Mordkoff JT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 27854456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-irrelevant stimulus-reward association induces value-driven attentional capture.
    Mine C; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1896-907. PubMed ID: 25893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies.
    Li Z; Lou J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1836-1845. PubMed ID: 30993656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.