These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29173141)

  • 21. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Barratt D; Bundesen C
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1223-37. PubMed ID: 22416914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hunger modulates behavioral disinhibition and attention allocation to food-associated cues in normal-weight controls.
    Loeber S; Grosshans M; Herpertz S; Kiefer F; Herpertz SC
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():32-9. PubMed ID: 23899903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Derailing the streetcar named desire. Cognitive distractions reduce individual differences in cravings and unhealthy snacking in response to palatable food.
    van Dillen LF; Andrade J
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():102-110. PubMed ID: 26375358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Components of reward-driven attentional capture.
    Sha LZ; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 26676872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transition from reactive control to proactive control across conflict adaptation: An sLORETA study.
    Suzuki K; Shinoda H
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():7-14. PubMed ID: 26432378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning?
    Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Vuilleumier P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160469. PubMed ID: 27483371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of attentional bias in the effect of food advertising on actual food intake among children.
    Folkvord F; Anschütz DJ; Wiers RW; Buijzen M
    Appetite; 2015 Jan; 84():251-8. PubMed ID: 25451582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flanker compatibility effects in patients with Parkinson's disease: impact of target onset delay and trial-by-trial stimulus variation.
    Cagigas XE; Filoteo JV; Stricker JL; Rilling LM; Friedrich FJ
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Apr; 63(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 17049703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Rapid Capture of Attention by Rewarded Objects.
    Donohue SE; Hopf JM; Bartsch MV; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 26741800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transcranial random-noise stimulation of visual cortex potentiates value-driven attentional capture.
    van Koningsbruggen MG; Ficarella SC; Battelli L; Hickey C
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 11(9):1481-8. PubMed ID: 27107297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rewards teach visual selective attention.
    Chelazzi L; Perlato A; Santandrea E; Della Libera C
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():58-72. PubMed ID: 23262054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors influencing the reinforcing value of fruit and unhealthy snacks.
    Vervoort L; Clauwaert A; Vandeweghe L; Vangeel J; Van Lippevelde W; Goossens L; Huybregts L; Lachat C; Eggermont S; Beullens K; Braet C; De Cock N
    Eur J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 56(8):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 27562777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The allocation of attention and working memory in visual crowding.
    Bacigalupo F; Luck SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1180-93. PubMed ID: 25514655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Doubts about actions and flanker incongruity-related potentials and performance.
    Tops M; Wijers AA
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 22490884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials.
    Mattler U
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 12739092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Zhang H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Food cravings in everyday life: An EMA study on snack-related thoughts, cravings, and consumption.
    Richard A; Meule A; Reichenberger J; Blechert J
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():215-223. PubMed ID: 28249745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.