These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29173462)

  • 1. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):472-476. PubMed ID: 29173462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 27702454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factors.
    Morrison GS; Poh N
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):200-218. PubMed ID: 29685302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the likelihood of "encapsulating all uncertainty".
    Martire KA; Edmond G; Navarro DJ; Newell BR
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):76-79. PubMed ID: 28063591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS; Ochoa F
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 26746825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact in forensic voice comparison of lack of calibration and of mismatched conditions between the known-speaker recording and the relevant-population sample recordings.
    Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 29291950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics.
    McNevin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():125-130. PubMed ID: 30296628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics: a Bayesian perspective.
    Freeman MD; Kohles SS
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 Feb; 17(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20129425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of LA-ICP-MS databases to calculate likelihood ratios for the forensic analysis of glass evidence.
    Corzo R; Hoffman T; Weis P; Franco-Pedroso J; Ramos D; Almirall J
    Talanta; 2018 Aug; 186():655-661. PubMed ID: 29784417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The logic of forensic pathology opinion.
    de Boer HH; Fronczek J; Berger CEH; Sjerps M
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Jul; 136(4):1027-1036. PubMed ID: 34988615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Closer Look.
    Lund SP; Iyer H
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2017; 122():1-32. PubMed ID: 34877093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical issues in DNA evidence.
    Brookfield JF
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1665-9. PubMed ID: 8582353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology.
    Steadman DW; Adams BJ; Konigsberg LW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Sep; 131(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16485302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science.
    Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100270. PubMed ID: 35634572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Score based procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios - Scores should take account of both similarity and typicality.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jan; 58(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 29332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculation of likelihood ratios for inference of biological sex from human skeletal remains.
    Morrison GS; Weber P; Basu N; Puch-Solis R; Randolph-Quinney PS
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2021; 3():100202. PubMed ID: 34647000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence.
    Ommen DM; Saunders CP; Neumann C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):383-387. PubMed ID: 27702456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior distributions for likelihood ratios in forensic science.
    van den Hout A; Alberink I
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 27702459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.