These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29174045)

  • 1. Effect of Temperature on the Size Distribution, Shell Properties, and Stability of Definity
    Shekhar H; Smith NJ; Raymond JL; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 44(2):434-446. PubMed ID: 29174045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
    Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attenuation and size distribution measurements of Definity and manipulated Definity populations.
    Goertz DE; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1376-88. PubMed ID: 17521801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic Behavior of a Reactivated, Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agent.
    Choudhury SA; Xie F; Dayton PA; Porter TR
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Feb; 30(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27939052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of temperature on the acoustic response and stability of size-isolated protein-shelled ultrasound contrast agents and SonoVue.
    Kaushik A; Khan AH; Pratibha ; Dalvi SV; Shekhar H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2324. PubMed ID: 37092939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic sizing of an ultrasound contrast agent.
    Maresca D; Emmer M; van Neer PL; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Muller M; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1713-21. PubMed ID: 20850027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro acoustic characterization of three phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents from 12 to 43 MHz.
    Sun C; Sboros V; Butler MB; Moran CM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 24361219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthesis of laboratory Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Park J; Park D; Shin U; Moon S; Kim C; Kim HS; Park H; Choi K; Jung B; Oh J; Seo J
    Molecules; 2013 Oct; 18(10):13078-95. PubMed ID: 24152677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of new nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents.
    Wu H; Rognin NG; Krupka TM; Solorio L; Yoshiara H; Guenette G; Sanders C; Kamiyama N; Exner AA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):2137-46. PubMed ID: 23932272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temperature dependent behavior of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Mulvana H; Stride E; Hajnal JV; Eckersley RJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):925-34. PubMed ID: 20447756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shell properties and concentration stability of acoustofluidic delivery agents.
    Alsadiq H; Tupally K; Vogel R; Kokil G; Parekh HS; Veidt M
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 33398637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of temperature, needle gauge and injection rate on the size distribution, concentration and acoustic responses of ultrasound contrast agents at high frequency.
    Sun C; Panagakou I; Sboros V; Butler MB; Kenwright D; Thomson AJ; Moran CM
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():84-91. PubMed ID: 27140502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of ultrasound contrast agents in current clinical practice with special focus on DEFINITY
    Salih M; Ali SM; Jena N; Ananthasubramaniam K
    Future Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 17(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 32897099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definity™ and MicroMarker™ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy.
    Helfield BL; Goertz DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1158-68. PubMed ID: 23363132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scaling of the viscoelastic shell properties of phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles with ultrasound frequency.
    Helfield BL; Leung BY; Huo X; Goertz DE
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1419-24. PubMed ID: 24746478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing how size distribution and concentration affect echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Koo B; Liu Y; Abboud M; Qin B; Wu Y; Choi S; Kozak D; Zheng J
    Ultrasonics; 2023 Jan; 127():106827. PubMed ID: 36063769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a Radiotherapeutic Megavoltage Beam on Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Collado-Lara G; Heymans SV; Godart J; D'Agostino E; D'hooge J; Van Den Abeele K; Vos HJ; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1857-1867. PubMed ID: 33810887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
    Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: linear properties (part I).
    Grishenkov D; Pecorari C; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1127-38. PubMed ID: 19427099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.