These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29174045)
21. Temperature-dependent differences in the nonlinear acoustic behavior of ultrasound contrast agents revealed by high-speed imaging and bulk acoustics. Mulvana H; Stride E; Tang M; Hajnal JV; Eckersley R Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1509-17. PubMed ID: 21741759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Enhanced heat deposition using ultrasound contrast agent--modeling and experimental observations. Razansky D; Einziger PD; Adam DR IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 16471440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of nesting shell size on brightness longevity and resistance to ultrasound-induced dissolution during enhanced B-mode contrast imaging. Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP Ultrasonics; 2014 Dec; 54(8):2099-108. PubMed ID: 25041980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microbubble sizing and shell characterization using flow cytometry. Tu J; Swalwell JE; Giraud D; Cui W; Chen W; Matula TJ IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 May; 58(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 21622051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of preactivation vial temperature on the acoustic properties of Definity™. Helfield BL; Huo X; Williams R; Goertz DE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1298-305. PubMed ID: 22502892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the temporal stability of Definity using double passive cavitation detection. Gauthier M; King DA; O'Brien WD J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1535-7. PubMed ID: 23980212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Subharmonic response of encapsulated microbubbles: conditions for existence and amplification. Kimmel E; Krasovitski B; Hoogi A; Razansky D; Adam D Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1767-76. PubMed ID: 17720301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interfacial Rheological Properties of Contrast Microbubble Targestar P as a Function of Ambient Pressure. Kumar KN; Sarkar K Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):1010-7. PubMed ID: 26777069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results. King DA; O'Brien WD J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 21302993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies. Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles. Chatterjee D; Sarkar K; Jain P; Schreppler NE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 15936494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents. Moran CM; Anderson T; Pye SD; Sboros V; McDicken WN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):629-39. PubMed ID: 10856626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pressure-dependent attenuation in ultrasound contrast agents. Chen Q; Zagzebski J; Wilson T; Stiles T Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 28(8):1041-51. PubMed ID: 12217440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering. Paul S; Russakow D; Rodgers T; Sarkar K; Cochran M; Wheatley MA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1277-91. PubMed ID: 23643050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microbubble type and distribution dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Wang S; Samiotaki G; Olumolade O; Feshitan JA; Konofagou EE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 24239362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of therapeutic microbubbles for enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery. Sun RR; Noble ML; Sun SS; Song S; Miao CH J Control Release; 2014 May; 182():111-20. PubMed ID: 24650644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles. Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Different behaviors of microbubbles in the liver: time-related quantitative analysis of two ultrasound contrast agents, Levovist and Definity. Maruyama H; Matsutani S; Saisho H; Mine Y; Yuki H; Miyata K Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1035-40. PubMed ID: 15474746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of Bubble Concentration on the in Vitro and in Vivo Performance of Highly Stable Lipid Shell-Stabilized Micro- and Nanoscale Ultrasound Contrast Agents. Abenojar EC; Nittayacharn P; de Leon AC; Perera R; Wang Y; Bederman I; Exner AA Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10192-10202. PubMed ID: 30913884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]