BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29174105)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes of dental implants after use of tenting for bony augmentation: a systematic review.
    Pourdanesh F; Esmaeelinejad M; Aghdashi F
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 55(10):999-1007. PubMed ID: 29174105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation.
    Le B; Burstein J; Sedghizadeh PP
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 18332757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Felice P; Karatzopoulos G; Worthington HV; Coulthard P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(3):167-84. PubMed ID: 20467628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study.
    Barone A; Varanini P; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1300-6. PubMed ID: 19446220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
    Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilamina cortical tenting grafting technique for three-dimensional reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridges in anterior maxillae: A 6-year prospective study.
    Yu H; Chen L; Zhu Y; Qiu L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 44(7):868-75. PubMed ID: 27235152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of initial alveolar ridge defect morphology on the outcome of implants in augmented atrophic posterior mandible: an exploratory retrospective study.
    Khojasteh A; Motamedian SR; Sharifzadeh N; Zadeh HH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):e208-e217. PubMed ID: 27804178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
    Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results.
    Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2039-46. PubMed ID: 17884536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
    Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic evaluation of the tenting screw technique in horizontal alveolar bone augmentation: A retrospective study.
    Yang S; Wang S; Shen X; Xu Y; Chen C; He F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):564-574. PubMed ID: 37130799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review.
    Aloy-Prósper A; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Mar; 20(2):e251-8. PubMed ID: 25662543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft and Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane using Tenting Screw: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Johar AO
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Apr; 20(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 31308269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation.
    Le B; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):428-35. PubMed ID: 20116718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of mandibular vertical defects for dental implants with autogenous bone block grafts using a tunnel approach: clinical study of 50 cases.
    Restoy-Lozano A; Dominguez-Mompell JL; Infante-Cossio P; Lara-Chao J; Espin-Galvez F; Lopez-Pizarro V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1416-22. PubMed ID: 26116063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft-systematic review.
    de Azambuja Carvalho PH; Dos Santos Trento G; Moura LB; Cunha G; Gabrielli MAC; Pereira-Filho VA
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 23(3):271-279. PubMed ID: 31089897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sinus/alveolar crest tenting (SACT): a new technique for implant placement in atrophic maxillary ridges without bone grafts or membranes.
    Winter AA; Pollack AS; Odrich RB
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):557-65. PubMed ID: 14703759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review.
    Aloy-Prósper A; Carramolino-Cuéllar E; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Soto-Peñaloza D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2022 Mar; 27(2):e181-e190. PubMed ID: 35218647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic review.
    Troeltzsch M; Troeltzsch M; Kauffmann P; Gruber R; Brockmeyer P; Moser N; Rau A; Schliephake H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1618-1629. PubMed ID: 27622971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.