61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29175838)
1. Comparison of two low-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests for confirming the success of early medical abortion.
Millar SL; Cameron ST
BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):54-57. PubMed ID: 29175838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: A systematic review.
Raymond EG; Shochet T; Bracken H
Contraception; 2018 Jul; 98(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29534996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test.
Michie L; Cameron ST
Contraception; 2014 May; 89(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 24560481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can women determine the success of early medical termination of pregnancy themselves?
Cameron ST; Glasier A; Johnstone A; Dewart H; Campbell A
Contraception; 2015 Jan; 91(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 25300644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation.
Cameron ST; Glasier A; Dewart H; Johnstone A; Burnside A
Contraception; 2012 Jul; 86(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 22225841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial.
Constant D; Harries J; Daskilewicz K; Myer L; Gemzell-Danielsson K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179600. PubMed ID: 28640845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Iyengar K; Paul M; Iyengar SD; Klingberg-Allvin M; Essén B; Bring J; Soni S; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Lancet Glob Health; 2015 Sep; 3(9):e537-45. PubMed ID: 26275330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timing and indication for curettage after medical abortion in early pregnant women with prior uterine incision.
Wang G; Li D; Manconi F; Dong B; Zhang Y; Sun B
Contraception; 2010 Jan; 81(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 20004275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of self-performed urine pregnancy testing for follow-up after medical abortion.
Hassoun D; Périn I; Hiên H; Demars HH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():174-8. PubMed ID: 26773308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up with a semiquantitative urine pregnancy test after medical abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan.
Platais I; Tsereteli T; Comendant R; Kurbanbekova D; Winikoff B
Contraception; 2015 Feb; 91(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 25497383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical utility of urine pregnancy assays to determine medical abortion outcome is limited.
Godfrey EM; Anderson A; Fielding SL; Meyn L; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2007 May; 75(5):378-82. PubMed ID: 17434020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shifting abortion care from a hospital to a community sexual and reproductive health care setting.
Cameron ST; Glasier A; Johnstone A
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2016 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 26250854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.
Oppegaard KS; Qvigstad E; Fiala C; Heikinheimo O; Benson L; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Lancet; 2015 Feb; 385(9969):698-704. PubMed ID: 25468164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can women accurately assess the outcome of medical abortion based on symptoms alone?
Jackson AV; Dayananda I; Fortin JM; Fitzmaurice G; Goldberg AB
Contraception; 2012 Feb; 85(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 22067786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New, simple and sensitive urinary and blood pregnancy tests. A market study with special reference to the diagnosis of extra-uterine pregnancies].
Daae LN; Jerve F; Torjesen P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 Mar; 107(7):656-8. PubMed ID: 3576561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methotrexate and misoprostol vs misoprostol alone for early abortion. A randomized controlled trial.
Creinin MD; Vittinghoff E
JAMA; 1994 Oct; 272(15):1190-5. PubMed ID: 7523739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis and monitoring of endangered early pregnancies with determination of oestrone, oestradiol 17beta, oestriol, progesterone and HPL in plasma and the pregnancy test in graduated dilutions of urine (author's transl)].
Strecker JR; Negulescu R; Dahlén H; Musch K
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Jun; 37(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 885322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A single serum test for measuring early pregnancy outcome with high predictive value.
Sutton-Riley JM; Khanlian SA; Byrn FW; Cole LA
Clin Biochem; 2006 Jul; 39(7):682-7. PubMed ID: 16765931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison.
van Mello NM; Mol F; Verhoeve HR; van Wely M; Adriaanse AH; Boss EA; Dijkman AB; Bayram N; Emanuel MH; Friederich J; van der Leeuw-Harmsen L; Lips JP; Van Kessel MA; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Hajenius PJ
Hum Reprod; 2013 Jan; 28(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 23081873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methotrexate and misoprostol for early abortion.
Schaff EA; Eisinger SH; Franks P; Kim SS
Fam Med; 1996 Mar; 28(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 8900553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
