111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29176274)
1. Increased Incidence of Visual Field Abnormalities as Determined by Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in High Computer Users Among Japanese Workers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Nakano T; Hayashi T; Nakagawa T; Honda T; Owada S; Endo H; Tatemichi M
J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):214-219. PubMed ID: 29176274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Possible association between heavy computer users and glaucomatous visual field abnormalities: a cross sectional study in Japanese workers.
Tatemichi M; Nakano T; Tanaka K; Hayashi T; Nawa T; Miyamoto T; Hiro H; Sugita M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Dec; 58(12):1021-7. PubMed ID: 15547065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Tatemichi M; Nakano T; Tanaka K; Hayashi T; Nawa T; Miyamoto T; Hiro H; Iwasaki A; Sugita M;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Oct; 134(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 12383809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Symptoms related to glaucomatous visual field abnormalities among male Japanese workers in a population-based setting.
Tatemichi M; Nakano T; Hayashi T; Tanaka K; Hiro H; Miyamoto T; Aratake M; Nishinoue N; Yamazaki A; Nakadate T; Sugita M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):546-51. PubMed ID: 20809905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of refractive correction on the accuracy of frequency-doubling technology Matrix.
Contestabile MT; Perdicchi A; Amodeo S; Paffetti L; Iester M; Recupero SM
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):413-5. PubMed ID: 23632396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.
Han S; Baek SH; Kim US
Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(5):647-650. PubMed ID: 27404791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1903-8. PubMed ID: 14522761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of frequency-doubling perimetry with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc size in ocular hypertensives and glaucoma suspects.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Ichhpujani P; Gupta A
J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 20717056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Changes in Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients: A Longitudinal Study.
Abe RY; Gracitelli CP; Diniz-Filho A; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Medeiros FA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 160(1):114-122.e1. PubMed ID: 25868760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.
Horn FK; Scharch V; Mardin CY; Lämmer R; Kremers J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 26883356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
Wesselink C; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
