These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29176274)

  • 21. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry.
    Kim TW; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sample PA; Shah N; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1053-7. PubMed ID: 17239441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2003 Jun; 16(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 12809159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Frequency doubling perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucomatous optic nerve fiber damage].
    Korzekwa W; Korzekwa M; Markowska J; Wójcik-Niklewska B; Romaniuk W; Korzekwa A; Michalska-Małecka K
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):222-4. PubMed ID: 15510506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
    Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma screening in health-check program].
    Kusaba K; Kawanami M; Ban Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 108(9):554-9. PubMed ID: 15506489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.
    Becker K; Semes L
    Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
    Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Puell MC; Barrio A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Frequency doubling perimetry in terminal visual field defects].
    Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G; González Martín-Moro J; Cerio-Ramsden CD
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Apr; 78(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 12743844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Kawa P; Jurkowska J; Zarnowski T; Zagórski Z
    Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong KC; Byles DB; Constable PH
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.