These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29177706)

  • 1. Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; Yam Y; Kansal V; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Germano G; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJW
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):538-548. PubMed ID: 29177706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic value of Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery bypass patients.
    Pen A; Yam Y; Chen L; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veladar E; Min JK; Pencina MJ; Berman DS; Beanlands RS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jul; 15(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 24477784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.
    Dorbala S; Hachamovitch R; Curillova Z; Thomas D; Vangala D; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):846-54. PubMed ID: 19608135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
    Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic significance of blood pressure response during vasodilator stress Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Witbrodt B; Goyal A; Kelkar AA; Dorbala S; Chow BJW; Di Carli MF; Williams BA; Merhige ME; Berman DS; Germano G; Beanlands RS; Min JK; Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; van Velthuijsen ML; Shaw LJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1966-1975. PubMed ID: 27659457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of sex on risk stratification with stress myocardial perfusion Rb-82 positron emission tomography: Results from the PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Prognosis Multicenter Registry.
    Kay J; Dorbala S; Goyal A; Fazel R; Di Carli MF; Einstein AJ; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Chow BJ; Min JK; Berman DS; Shah S; Bellam N; Butler J; Shaw LJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 62(20):1866-76. PubMed ID: 23850903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry.
    Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Chow BJ; Min JK; Pencina MJ; Berman DS; Shaw LJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 61(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 23219297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia.
    Ziadi MC; Dekemp RA; Williams KA; Guo A; Chow BJ; Renaud JM; Ruddy TD; Sarveswaran N; Tee RE; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(7):740-8. PubMed ID: 21816311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of
    Brophey MD; Farukhi IM; Castanon R; DeLaPena R; Bradshaw L; Banerjee S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Jun; 45(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 28408703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic utility of splenic response ratio in dipyridamole PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Bami K; Tewari S; Guirguis F; Garrard L; Guo A; Hossain A; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RSB; deKemp RA; Chow BJW; Dwivedi G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1888-1897. PubMed ID: 29651739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
    Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Chow BJ; Ananthasubramaniam K; dekemp RA; Dalipaj MM; Beanlands RS; Ruddy TD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 15837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Independent prognostic value of left ventricular contractile reserve and chronotropic response in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging with Rb-82 positron emission tomography.
    Tamarappoo BK; Fong Ling L; Cerqueira M; Hachamovitch R
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 19(4):442-449. PubMed ID: 28673042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic value of PET myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients.
    Chow BJ; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Pencina MJ; Yam Y; Chen L; Anand SP; Ruddy TD; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Beanlands RS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 7(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 24560212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of impaired chronotropic response to pharmacologic stress Rb-82 PET.
    Bellam N; Veledar E; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Shah S; Eapen D; Quyyumi A; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Chow BJ; Min JK; Berman DS; Shaw LJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 21(2):233-44. PubMed ID: 24482141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
    Lertsburapa K; Ahlberg AW; Bateman TM; Katten D; Volker L; Cullom SJ; Heller GV
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 18984449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET.
    Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiovascular risk stratification in diabetic patients following stress single-photon emission-computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: the impact of achieved exercise level.
    Padala SK; Ghatak A; Padala S; Katten DM; Polk DM; Heller GV
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1132-43. PubMed ID: 25208530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine Clinical Quantitative Rest Stress Myocardial Perfusion for Managing Coronary Artery Disease: Clinical Relevance of Test-Retest Variability.
    Kitkungvan D; Johnson NP; Roby AE; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):565-577. PubMed ID: 28017383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does risk for major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing vasodilator stress with adjunctive exercise differ from patients undergoing either standard exercise or vasodilator stress with myocardial perfusion imaging?
    Nair SU; Ahlberg AW; Katten DM; Heller GV
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 25124828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.