356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29177797)
1. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments.
Krucien N; Watson V; Ryan M
Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e1-e16. PubMed ID: 27917560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.
Cheung KL; Wijnen BF; Hollin IL; Janssen EM; Bridges JF; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1195-1209. PubMed ID: 27402349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling?
Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Oppe M; Krabbe PF
Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 15(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 23553075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
Webb EJD; Meads D; Lynch Y; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
Value Health; 2021 Apr; 24(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 33840436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.
Schatz NK; Fabiano GA; Cunningham CE; dosReis S; Waschbusch DA; Jerome S; Lupas K; Morris KL
Patient; 2015 Dec; 8(6):483-97. PubMed ID: 25644223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.
Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S;
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.
Severin F; Schmidtke J; Mühlbacher A; Rogowski WH
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Nov; 21(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 23486538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do Discrete Choice Experiments Approaches Perform Better Than Time Trade-Off in Eliciting Health State Utilities? Evidence From SF-6Dv2 in China.
Xie S; Wu J; He X; Chen G; Brazier JE
Value Health; 2020 Oct; 23(10):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 33032784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Valuing Treatments for Parkinson Disease Incorporating Process Utility: Performance of Best-Worst Scaling, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analogue Scales.
Weernink MG; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; IJzerman MJ; van Til JA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 27021757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
