218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29178414)
1. Developing and validating a multivariable prediction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy in determination of cervical versus endometrial origin of uterine adenocarcinomas: A prospective MR study combining diffusion-weighted imaging and spectroscopy.
Lin G; Lin YC; Wu RC; Yang LY; Lu HY; Tsai SY; Huang YT; Huang YL; Lu KY; Ng KK; Yen TC; Chao A; Lai CH; Hong JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1654-1666. PubMed ID: 29178414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging at 3T.
Lin G; Huang YT; Chao A; Lin YC; Yang LY; Wu RC; Lu HY; Ng SH; Ng KK; Lai CH
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1867-1876. PubMed ID: 27631107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicystic mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix compared with benign multicystic lesions: Multiparametric MR features.
Song J; Hu Q; Huang J; Ma Z; Chen T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1336-1343. PubMed ID: 29624774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.
Marconi DG; Fregnani JH; Rossini RR; Netto AK; Lucchesi FR; Tsunoda AT; Kamrava M
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():556. PubMed ID: 27469349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium.
Lin YC; Lin G; Chen YR; Yen TC; Wang CC; Ng KK
Chang Gung Med J; 2011; 34(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 21392479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined subjective and quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images could improve the diagnostic performance of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.
Deng L; Wang QP; Yan R; Yu N; Bai L; Duan XY; Guo YM
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():69-73. PubMed ID: 28232207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Cheng R; Liu S; Qu F; Yin X; Wang Q; Xiao B; Ye Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 29761595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative tumor texture analysis on MRI predicts high-risk disease and reduced survival in endometrial cancer.
Ytre-Hauge S; Dybvik JA; Lundervold A; Salvesen ØO; Krakstad C; Fasmer KE; Werner HM; Ganeshan B; Høivik E; Bjørge L; Trovik J; Haldorsen IS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1637-1647. PubMed ID: 30102441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi M; Kozawa E; Tanisaka M; Hasegawa K; Yasuda M; Sakai F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 26605502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Hu Y; Zhou Y; Ye X; Liu K; Bai G; Guo A; Du M; Jiang L; Wang J; Yan Z
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):46390-46397. PubMed ID: 28634318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: MRI findings including diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Harada M
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 26787673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in distinguishing the origin of adenocarcinoma at the junction of the lower uterine segment and endocervix].
Zhang J; Wang YC; Yu XD; Tian Y; Li XL; Zhang LY; Zhang J; Zhao XM; Chen Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 40(12):912-916. PubMed ID: 30605982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial vs. cervical cancer: development and pilot testing of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for predicting tumor origin of uterine carcinomas of indeterminate histology.
Bourgioti C; Chatoupis K; Panourgias E; Tzavara C; Sarris K; Rodolakis A; Moulopoulos LA
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2529-40. PubMed ID: 25794993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of MR diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosis and outcome prediction for uterine cervical cancer].
Wu B; Huang X; Peng W; Gu Y; Yang T; Mao J; Ke G; Wu X
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 36(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 24796459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI in uterine cancers with uncertain origin: Endometrial or cervical? Radiological point of view with review of the literature.
Gui B; Lupinelli M; Russo L; Miccò M; Avesani G; Panico C; Di Paola V; Rodolfino E; Autorino R; Ferrandina G; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Manfredi R
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110357. PubMed ID: 35598459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Erbay G; Guler OC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26919800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative assessment of low risk endometrial carcinoma.
Shen Y; Lv F; Xiao Z; Bi Q
Clin Imaging; 2019; 56():28-32. PubMed ID: 30851496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine Learning-Based Integration of Prognostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers for Myometrial Invasion Stratification in Endometrial Cancer.
Rodríguez-Ortega A; Alegre A; Lago V; Carot-Sierra JM; Ten-Esteve A; Montoliu G; Domingo S; Alberich-Bayarri Á; Martí-Bonmatí L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Sep; 54(3):987-995. PubMed ID: 33793008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma.
Chen J; Fan W; Gu H; Wang Y; Liu Y; Chen X; Ren S; Wang Z
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 32727213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
