These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29178451)
1. Using imputed genotype data in the joint score tests for genetic association and gene-environment interactions in case-control studies. Song M; Wheeler W; Caporaso NE; Landi MT; Chatterjee N Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 42(2):146-155. PubMed ID: 29178451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of untyped SNPs: maximum likelihood and imputation methods. Hu YJ; Lin DY Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):803-15. PubMed ID: 21104886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Jackknife-based gene-gene interactiontests for untyped SNPs. Song M BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 26187382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ATRIUM: testing untyped SNPs in case-control association studies with related individuals. Wang Z; McPeek MS Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 85(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 19913122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast and robust association tests for untyped SNPs in case-control studies. Allen AS; Satten GA; Bray SL; Dudbridge F; Epstein MP Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 20689309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Likelihood Ratio Test for Gene-Environment Interaction Based on the Trend Effect of Genotype Under an Additive Risk Model Using the Gene-Environment Independence Assumption. de Rochemonteix M; Napolioni V; Sanyal N; Belloy ME; Caporaso NE; Landi MT; Greicius MD; Chatterjee N; Han SS Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 190(1):129-141. PubMed ID: 32870973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies. Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction association analysis of imputed SNPs in case-control and follow-up studies. Subirana I; González JR Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 25613387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genotype imputation in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction: validity and power. Aleknonytė-Resch M; Szymczak S; Freitag-Wolf S; Dempfle A; Krawczak M Hum Genet; 2021 Aug; 140(8):1217-1228. PubMed ID: 34041609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Robust Test for Additive Gene-Environment Interaction Under the Trend Effect of Genotype Using an Empirical Bayes-Type Shrinkage Estimator. Sanyal N; Napolioni V; de Rochemonteix M; Belloy ME; Caporaso NE; Landi MT; Greicius MD; Chatterjee N; Han SS Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 190(9):1948-1960. PubMed ID: 33942053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome-wide association of breast cancer: composite likelihood with imputed genotypes. Politopoulos I; Gibson J; Tapper W; Ennis S; Eccles D; Collins A Eur J Hum Genet; 2011 Feb; 19(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20959865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An empirical evaluation of imputation accuracy for association statistics reveals increased type-I error rates in genome-wide associations. Almeida MA; Oliveira PS; Pereira TV; Krieger JE; Pereira AC BMC Genet; 2011 Jan; 12():10. PubMed ID: 21251252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Genetic Marginal Effects to Study Gene-Environment Interactions with GWAS Data. Verhulst B; Pritikin JN; Clifford J; Prom-Wormley E Behav Genet; 2021 May; 51(3):358-373. PubMed ID: 33899139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced statistical tests for GWAS in admixed populations: assessment using African Americans from CARe and a Breast Cancer Consortium. Pasaniuc B; Zaitlen N; Lettre G; Chen GK; Tandon A; Kao WH; Ruczinski I; Fornage M; Siscovick DS; Zhu X; Larkin E; Lange LA; Cupples LA; Yang Q; Akylbekova EL; Musani SK; Divers J; Mychaleckyj J; Li M; Papanicolaou GJ; Millikan RC; Ambrosone CB; John EM; Bernstein L; Zheng W; Hu JJ; Ziegler RG; Nyante SJ; Bandera EV; Ingles SA; Press MF; Chanock SJ; Deming SL; Rodriguez-Gil JL; Palmer CD; Buxbaum S; Ekunwe L; Hirschhorn JN; Henderson BE; Myers S; Haiman CA; Reich D; Patterson N; Wilson JG; Price AL PLoS Genet; 2011 Apr; 7(4):e1001371. PubMed ID: 21541012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes. Chatterjee N; Chen YH; Luo S; Carroll RJ Stat Sci; 2009 Nov; 24(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20543902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical issues in imputation-based association mapping. Guan Y; Stephens M PLoS Genet; 2008 Dec; 4(12):e1000279. PubMed ID: 19057666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new statistic to evaluate imputation reliability. Lin P; Hartz SM; Zhang Z; Saccone SF; Wang J; Tischfield JA; Edenberg HJ; Kramer JR; M Goate A; Bierut LJ; Rice JP; PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9697. PubMed ID: 20300623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The case-only test for gene-environment interaction is not uniformly powerful: an empirical example. Wu C; Chang J; Ma B; Miao X; Zhou Y; Liu Y; Li Y; Wu T; Hu Z; Shen H; Jia W; Zeng Y; Lin D; Kraft P Genet Epidemiol; 2013 May; 37(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 23595356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic association analysis and meta-analysis of imputed SNPs in longitudinal studies. Subirana I; González JR Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 37(5):465-77. PubMed ID: 23595425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of approaches to account for uncertainty in analysis of imputed genotypes. Zheng J; Li Y; Abecasis GR; Scheet P Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 21254217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]