These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29178744)

  • 1. Effect of finishing technique on the occurrence and length of microcracks in resin-based materials.
    de Vasconcellos AB; Delgado A; Hirata R; Blackmon R; Swift EJ; Heymann HO; Oldenburg AL; Ritter AV
    Am J Dent; 2016 Oct; 29(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 29178744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Finishing Techniques on the Marginal Integrity of Resin-Based Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration.
    Delgado AJ; Ritter AV; Donovan TE; Ziemiecki T; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(4):184-93. PubMed ID: 26177046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hardness of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials as a function of depth and time.
    Roberts HW; Berzins DW; Charlton DG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 19689726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer.
    Pedrini D; Candido MS; Rodrigues AL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):714-9. PubMed ID: 12791157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 12426504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of restorative materials to hydroxyapatite inserts and dimensional changes of insert-containing restorations during polymerization.
    Lezaja M; Veljovic D; Manojlovic D; Milosevic M; Mitrovic N; Janackovic D; Miletic V
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 25541508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.