These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29178955)

  • 1. Cost evaluation, quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Kularatna S; Herath R; Wijesinghe P
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):565. PubMed ID: 29178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenges of Costing a Surgical Procedure in a Lower-Middle-Income Country.
    Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Kularatna S; Herath R; Wijesinghe P
    World J Surg; 2019 Jan; 43(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 30128774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal, sexual and urinary symptoms following hysterectomy: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Herath R; Wijesinghe P
    Womens Midlife Health; 2020; 6():1. PubMed ID: 32161653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inpatient Hospital Costs and Route of Hysterectomy for Management of Benign Uterine Disease in the 90-Day Global Billing Period.
    Bauer HH; Sahmoud A; Rhodes SP; Sheyn D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 144(2):266-274. PubMed ID: 38870524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
    Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with second-generation endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the HEALTH RCT.
    Cooper K; Breeman S; Scott NW; Scotland G; Hernández R; Clark TJ; Hawe J; Hawthorn R; Phillips K; Wileman S; McCormack K; Norrie J; Bhattacharya S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Sep; 23(53):1-108. PubMed ID: 31577219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Baekelandt J; De Mulder PA; Le Roy I; Mathieu C; Laenen A; Enzlin P; Weyers S; Mol BW; Bosteels JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():6-15. PubMed ID: 27880893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.
    Garry R; Fountain J; Brown J; Manca A; Mason S; Sculpher M; Napp V; Bridgman S; Gray J; Lilford R
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(26):1-154. PubMed ID: 15215018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
    Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Bhattacharya S; Middleton LJ; Tsourapas A; Lee AJ; Champaneria R; Daniels JP; Roberts T; Hilken NH; Barton P; Gray R; Khan KS; Chien P; O'Donovan P; Cooper KG; ; Abbott J; Barrington J; Bhattacharya S; Bongers MY; Brun JL; Busfield R; Clark TJ; Cooper J; Cooper KG; Corson SL; Dickersin K; Dwyer N; Gannon M; Hawe J; Hurskainen R; Meyer WR; O'Connor H; Pinion S; Sambrook AM; Tam WH; van Zon-Rabelink IA; Zupi E
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Apr; 15(19):iii-xvi, 1-252. PubMed ID: 21535970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
    Aarts JW; Nieboer TE; Johnson N; Tavender E; Garry R; Mol BW; Kluivers KB
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD003677. PubMed ID: 26264829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Glazener C; Constable L; Hemming C; Breeman S; Elders A; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith AR; Hagen S; McDonald A; McPherson G; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Goulao B; Norrie J
    Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 27609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effectiveness analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in Western China: a societal perspective.
    Yang J; Fan X; Gao J; Li D; Xu Y; Chen G
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Feb; 22(1):252. PubMed ID: 35209891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative costs of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    East M
    N Z Med J; 1994 Sep; 107(986 Pt 1):371-4. PubMed ID: 7936464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual Function following Laparoscopic versus Transvaginal Closure of the Vaginal Vault after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial by the Italian Society of Gynecological Endoscopy Using a Validated Questionnaire.
    Uccella S; Capozzi VA; Ricco' M; Perrone E; Zanello M; Ferrari S; Zorzato PC; Seracchioli R; Cromi A; Serati M; Ergasti R; Fanfani F; Berretta R; Malzoni M; Cianci S; Vizza E; Guido M; Legge F; Ciravolo G; Gueli Alletti S; Ghezzi F; Candiani M; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):186-194. PubMed ID: 30951920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
    Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Ellström M; Ferraz-Nunes J; Hahlin M; Olsson JH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 9464716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.
    Bouwsma EVA; Bosmans JE; van Dongen JM; Brölmann HAM; Anema JR; Huirne JAF
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e017782. PubMed ID: 29358423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.