BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29179139)

  • 1. A comparison of two evisceration methods on hygienic quality in the pelvic area of sheep carcasses.
    Røssvoll E; Røtterud OJ; Hauge SJ; Alvseike O
    Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():134-138. PubMed ID: 29179139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of shearing and fleece cleanliness on microbiological contamination of lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nafstad O; Skjerve E; Røtterud OJ; Nesbakken T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 150(2-3):178-83. PubMed ID: 21862163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of hygienic treatments during slaughtering on microbial dynamics and contamination of sheep meat.
    Omer MK; Hauge SJ; Østensvik Ø; Moen B; Alvseike O; Røtterud OJ; Prieto M; Dommersnes S; Nesteng OH; Nesbakken T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 194():7-14. PubMed ID: 25461602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enumeration of Escherichia coli in swab samples from pre- and post-chilled pork and lamb carcasses using 3M™ Petrifilm™ Select E. coli and Simplate® Coliforms/E. coli.
    Hauge SJ; Østensvik Ø; Monshaugen M; Røtterud OJ; Nesbakken T; Alvseike O
    Meat Sci; 2017 Aug; 130():26-29. PubMed ID: 28390262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological contamination of ovine carcasses associated with the presence of wool and faecal material.
    Biss ME; Hathaway SC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Dec; 81(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 8972086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Moen B; Røtterud OJ; Dommersnes S; Nesteng O; Østensvik Ø; Alvseike O
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():70-76. PubMed ID: 26248068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the SimPlate method for enumeration of Escherichia coli in swab samples from beef and lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Skjerve E; Dommarsnes K; Østensvik Ø
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 142(1-2):229-33. PubMed ID: 20659776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of control over the microbiological contamination of carcasses in a lamb carcass dressing process operated with or without pasteurizing treatment.
    Milios K; Mataragas M; Pantouvakis A; Drosinos EH; Zoiopoulos PE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 21406314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial contamination on beef and sheep carcases in South Australia.
    Sumner J; Petrenas E; Dean P; Dowsett P; West G; Wiering R; Raven G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 81(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12485752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hygienic Status Assessment of Two Lamb Slaughterhouses in Spain.
    Alonso-Calleja C; Guerrero-Ramos E; Capita R
    J Food Prot; 2017 Jul; 80(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 28598204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction to trace the fate of generic Escherichia coli within a high capacity pork slaughter line.
    Namvar A; Warriner K
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16386814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of visible faecal material as a vehicle for generic Escherichia coli, coliform, and other enterobacteria contaminating poultry carcasses during slaughtering.
    Jiménez SM; Tiburzi MC; Salsi MS; Pirovani ME; Moguilevsky MA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 95(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 12911691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli from serotype O157 and other attaching and effacing Escherichia coli on bovine carcasses in Algeria.
    Chahed A; China B; Mainil J; Daube G
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 101(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16882143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between slaughter practices and the distribution of Salmonella and hygiene indicator bacteria on pig carcasses during slaughter.
    Biasino W; De Zutter L; Mattheus W; Bertrand S; Uyttendaele M; Van Damme I
    Food Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 70():192-199. PubMed ID: 29173627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial effect of steam vacuum pasteurisation implemented after slaughtering and dressing of sheep and lamb.
    Hassan AA; Skjerve E; Bergh C; Nesbakken T
    Meat Sci; 2015 Jan; 99():32-7. PubMed ID: 25280360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced contamination of pig carcasses using an alternative pluck set removal procedure during slaughter.
    Biasino W; De Zutter L; Woollard J; Mattheus W; Bertrand S; Uyttendaele M; Van Damme I
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():23-30. PubMed ID: 29859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.