These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29179421)

  • 1. Enhancing Ethics in Peer Review Process.
    Agoramoorthy G
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 108():975-976. PubMed ID: 29179421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
    Siedlecki SL
    Nursing; 2015 Dec; 45(12):51-4. PubMed ID: 26580113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ethics of peer review in bioethics.
    Wendler D; Miller F
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Oct; 40(10):697-701. PubMed ID: 24131903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery".
    Orbay H; Sensöz O
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Aug; 118(2):579-80; author reply 580-1. PubMed ID: 16874271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refereeing: What football can teach science.
    Sala A
    Nature; 2014 Dec; 516(7531):329. PubMed ID: 25519121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership.
    Horner J; Minifie FD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):S330-45. PubMed ID: 21081679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics of reviewing scientific publications.
    Napolitani F; Petrini C; Garattini S
    Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():22-25. PubMed ID: 28038824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
    Siedlecki SL
    Nurs Manage; 2016 Jul; 47(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 27351121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The limits and power of peer review.
    Hammerschmidt DE; Franklin M
    Minn Med; 2006 Jun; 89(6):43-5. PubMed ID: 16846184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cutting the cake! Publication ethics in science.
    Svensson P; Andersson L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 40(7):483. PubMed ID: 23521045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics and Oversight in Publication.
    Pollock NW
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2016 Dec; 27(4):449. PubMed ID: 27912862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2010 Aug; 5(8):553. PubMed ID: 20689520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ethics of peer review process.
    Remuzzi G
    Updates Surg; 2023 Sep; 75(6):1391-1392. PubMed ID: 37491588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [ON THE OCCASION OF PUBLICATION OF "PRODUCTION OF ARTICLES ON CLINICAL TRIALS" AND "MEDI- CAL ETHICS REQUIRED FOR CLINICAL TRIALS"].
    Baba H
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jan; 117(1):49. PubMed ID: 27078901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: A critical step in the editorial process.
    Agrawal R
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(3):347-349. PubMed ID: 32769320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extending the olive branch.
    McMurphy S; Lewis J; Boulos P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 24169419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The responsible conduct of bioethics research.
    Master Z
    Account Res; 2011 Mar; 18(2):102-19. PubMed ID: 21390874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: universal, but valid?
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Apr; 88(4):848-51. PubMed ID: 19358120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 28639928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.