These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The role of culture in research misconduct. Davis MS Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Neutralising fair credit: factors that influence unethical authorship practices. Trinkle BS; Phillips T; Hall A; Moffatt B J Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 43(6):368-373. PubMed ID: 28143944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The "how" and "whys" of research: life scientists' views of accountability. Ladd JM; Lappé MD; McCormick JB; Boyce AM; Cho MK J Med Ethics; 2009 Dec; 35(12):762-7. PubMed ID: 19948933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Are You Sure You Want to Do That? Fostering the Responsible Conduct of Medical Education Research. Maggio LA; Artino AR; Picho K; Driessen EW Acad Med; 2018 Apr; 93(4):544-549. PubMed ID: 28678102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making. Maggio LA; Artino AR; Watling CJ; Driessen EW; O'Brien BC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 53(12):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 31475382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research. Barrett KA; Funk CL; Macrina FL Account Res; 2005; 12(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 16634171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts. Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding. Okeigwe I; Wang C; Politch JA; Heffner LJ; Kuohung W Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):84.e1-84.e8. PubMed ID: 28315665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The ethics of research in mental illness. Ghaemi SN; Hundert EM J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Ethics in research: current issues for dental researchers and their professional society. Frankel MS J Dent Res; 1994 Nov; 73(11):1759-65. PubMed ID: 7983263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports. Ellis RJ eNeuro; 2022; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 35922130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity. Adams D; Pimple KD Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. National Institutes of Health Funding to Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery at U.S. Medical Schools. Silvestre J; Ahn J; Levin LS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jan; 99(2):e5. PubMed ID: 28099310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dual use and the ethical responsibility of scientists. Ehni HJ Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 18512027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Thinking About Data, Research Methods, and Statistical Analyses: Commentary on Sijtsma's (2014) "Playing with Data". Waldman ID; Lilienfeld SO Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 25820981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists. Anderson MS; Martinson BC; De Vries R J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2007 Dec; 2(4):3-14. PubMed ID: 19385804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]