177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29179653)
1. Walk this way: validity evidence of iphone health application step count in laboratory and free-living conditions.
Duncan MJ; Wunderlich K; Zhao Y; Faulkner G
J Sports Sci; 2018 Aug; 36(15):1695-1704. PubMed ID: 29179653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions.
Höchsmann C; Knaier R; Eymann J; Hintermann J; Infanger D; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1818-1827. PubMed ID: 29460319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How Well iPhones Measure Steps in Free-Living Conditions: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.
Amagasa S; Kamada M; Sasai H; Fukushima N; Kikuchi H; Lee IM; Inoue S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e10418. PubMed ID: 30626569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of three Android-based pedometer applications in laboratory and free-living settings.
Leong JY; Wong JE
J Sports Sci; 2017 Jan; 35(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 26950687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smartphone pedometers in adults with asthma: a practical approach to physical activity assessment? A pilot validation study.
Reilly C; Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A; Clifton I; McKenna J; Peckham D; Price OJ
J Asthma; 2022 May; 59(5):967-975. PubMed ID: 33504229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the iPhone M7 motion co-processor as a pedometer for able-bodied ambulation.
Major MJ; Alford M
J Sports Sci; 2016 Dec; 34(23):2160-2164. PubMed ID: 27240005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Smart Socks to Detect Step-count at Slow Walking Speeds in Healthy Adults.
Balmain BN; Tuttle N; Bailey J; Cheng K; Duryea M; Houlihan J; Wotherspoon J; Morris N
Int J Sports Med; 2019 Feb; 40(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 30544268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Criterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Study.
Mayorga-Vega D; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Viciana J
J Sports Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 23(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 38455433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of smartphone pedometer applications.
Orr K; Howe HS; Omran J; Smith KA; Palmateer TM; Ma AE; Faulkner G
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Nov; 8():733. PubMed ID: 26621351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of smartphones and activity trackers to measure steps in a free-living setting over three consecutive days.
Höchsmann C; Knaier R; Infanger D; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
Physiol Meas; 2020 Jan; 41(1):015001. PubMed ID: 31851949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of different stepping counters during treadmill and over ground walking.
Simonsen MB; Thomsen MJ; Hirata RP
Gait Posture; 2020 Jul; 80():80-83. PubMed ID: 32497979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings.
Lee JA; Williams SM; Brown DD; Laurson KR
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 25517396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a valid app for that? Validity of a free pedometer iPhone application.
Bergman RJ; Spellman JW; Hall ME; Bergman SM
J Phys Act Health; 2012 Jul; 9(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 21946023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lifesource XL-18 pedometer for measuring steps under controlled and free-living conditions.
Liu S; Brooks D; Thomas S; Eysenbach G; Nolan RP
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):1001-6. PubMed ID: 25517481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of the "Samsung Health" application to measure steps: A study with two different samsung smartphones.
Beltrán-Carrillo VJ; Jiménez-Loaisa A; Alarcón-López M; Elvira JLL
J Sports Sci; 2019 Apr; 37(7):788-794. PubMed ID: 30332917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Garner HR; Bassett DR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the Omron pedometer and the actigraph step count function in preschoolers.
De Craemer M; De Decker E; Santos-Lozano A; Verloigne M; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Deforche B; Cardon G
J Sci Med Sport; 2015 May; 18(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 24994695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Bassett DR; Thompson DL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 21904249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
