These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29179665)
1. Effect size calculation in meta-analyses of psychotherapy outcome research. Hoyt WT; Del Re AC Psychother Res; 2018 May; 28(3):379-388. PubMed ID: 29179665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods. Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 21447428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining follow-up and change data is valid in meta-analyses of continuous outcomes: a meta-epidemiological study. da Costa BR; Nüesch E; Rutjes AW; Johnston BC; Reichenbach S; Trelle S; Guyatt GH; Jüni P J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):847-55. PubMed ID: 23747228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis. Thompson CG; Becker BJ Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 26052849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of directionality of significance tests on the bias of accessible effect sizes. Hsu LM Psychol Methods; 2000 Sep; 5(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11004871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exact method for computing absolute percent change in a dichotomous outcome from meta-analytic effect size: improving impact and cost-outcome estimates. Miller TR; Hendrie D; Derzon J Value Health; 2011 Jan; 14(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 21211496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect size calculations for the clinician: methods and comparability. Seidel JA; Miller SD; Chow DL Psychother Res; 2014; 24(4):470-84. PubMed ID: 24188906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward. Alexander PE; Bonner AJ; Agarwal A; Li SA; Hariharan A; Izhar Z; Bhatnagar N; Alba C; Akl EA; Fei Y; Guyatt GH; Beyene J J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 26597972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of raw mean differences. Bond CF; Wiitala WL; Richard FD Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 14664679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents. Merry S; McDowell H; Hetrick S; Bir J; Muller N Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD003380. PubMed ID: 14974014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does psychotherapy work with school-aged youth? A meta-analytic examination of moderator variables that influence therapeutic outcomes. Fedewa AL; Ahn S; Reese RJ; Suarez MM; Macquoid A; Davis MC; Prout HT J Sch Psychol; 2016 Jun; 56():59-87. PubMed ID: 27268570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the estimated intraclass correlation for correcting differences in effect size by level. Ahn S; Myers ND; Jin Y Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):490-502. PubMed ID: 21960061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]