302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29179709)
1. Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review.
Trace S; Kolstoe SE
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 29179709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
Klitzman R
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
Elsayed DE; Kass NE
Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.
Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O; Munung NS; Tangwa GB
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 27178053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison.
Angell E; Sutton AJ; Windridge K; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2006 Nov; 32(11):662-4. PubMed ID: 17074825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era.
Tamariz L; Hendler FJ; Wells JM; Anderson A; Bartlett S
Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Sep; 43(5):42-44. PubMed ID: 34496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review.
Piasecki J; Waligora M; Dranseika V
Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Jun; 23(3):743-768. PubMed ID: 27848192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement.
Suzuki M; Sato K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):256-66. PubMed ID: 27534589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.
Valdez-Martinez E; Turnbull B; Garduño-Espinosa J; Porter JD
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 May; 6(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 16594973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches.
Davies H; Wells F; Czarkowski M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):382-3. PubMed ID: 19482984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics review in research: role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely.
Beales IL
BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7441):710. PubMed ID: 15031252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.
Sewankambo NK; Kutyabami P
Infect Dis Poverty; 2022 Sep; 11(1):103. PubMed ID: 36171611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
Ballantyne A; Moore A
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
Mielke J; Ndebele P
Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement.
Edwards SJ; Ashcroft R; Kirchin S
Bioethics; 2004 Sep; 18(5):408-27. PubMed ID: 15462024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics review in research: ethics committees are risk averse.
Minnis HJ
BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7441):710-1. PubMed ID: 15031253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
