These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29179779)
21. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Richards S; Aziz N; Bale S; Bick D; Das S; Gastier-Foster J; Grody WW; Hegde M; Lyon E; Spector E; Voelkerding K; Rehm HL; Genet Med; 2015 May; 17(5):405-24. PubMed ID: 25741868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A variant by any name: quantifying annotation discordance across tools and clinical databases. Yen JL; Garcia S; Montana A; Harris J; Chervitz S; Morra M; West J; Chen R; Church DM Genome Med; 2017 Jan; 9(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Variability in gene-based knowledge impacts variant classification: an analysis of FBN1 missense variants in ClinVar. Baudhuin LM; Kluge ML; Kotzer KE; Lagerstedt SA Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 31227806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CardioVAI: An automatic implementation of ACMG-AMP variant interpretation guidelines in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. Nicora G; Limongelli I; Gambelli P; Memmi M; Malovini A; Mazzanti A; Napolitano C; Priori S; Bellazzi R Hum Mutat; 2018 Dec; 39(12):1835-1846. PubMed ID: 30298955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating the impact of in silico predictors on clinical variant classification. Wilcox EH; Sarmady M; Wulf B; Wright MW; Rehm HL; Biesecker LG; Abou Tayoun AN Genet Med; 2022 Apr; 24(4):924-930. PubMed ID: 34955381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Variant Interpretation for Cancer (VIC): a computational tool for assessing clinical impacts of somatic variants. He MM; Li Q; Yan M; Cao H; Hu Y; He KY; Cao K; Li MM; Wang K Genome Med; 2019 Aug; 11(1):53. PubMed ID: 31443733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks. Brnich SE; Rivera-Muñoz EA; Berg JS Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1531-1541. PubMed ID: 30095857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gene-specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: Recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel. Mester JL; Ghosh R; Pesaran T; Huether R; Karam R; Hruska KS; Costa HA; Lachlan K; Ngeow J; Barnholtz-Sloan J; Sesock K; Hernandez F; Zhang L; Milko L; Plon SE; Hegde M; Eng C Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1581-1592. PubMed ID: 30311380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants. Zhang J; Yao Y; He H; Shen J Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2020 Jun; 106(1):e98. PubMed ID: 32176464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-Throughput Genetic Testing in ALS: The Challenging Path of Variant Classification Considering the ACMG Guidelines. Lattante S; Marangi G; Doronzio PN; Conte A; Bisogni G; Zollino M; Sabatelli M Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 32987860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cruxome: a powerful tool for annotating, interpreting and reporting genetic variants. Han Q; Yang Y; Wu S; Liao Y; Zhang S; Liang H; Cram DS; Zhang Y BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):407. PubMed ID: 34082700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP standards and guidelines for mitochondrial DNA variant interpretation. McCormick EM; Lott MT; Dulik MC; Shen L; Attimonelli M; Vitale O; Karaa A; Bai R; Pineda-Alvarez DE; Singh LN; Stanley CM; Wong S; Bhardwaj A; Merkurjev D; Mao R; Sondheimer N; Zhang S; Procaccio V; Wallace DC; Gai X; Falk MJ Hum Mutat; 2020 Dec; 41(12):2028-2057. PubMed ID: 32906214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants. Hoskinson DC; Dubuc AM; Mason-Suares H Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2017 Feb; 42():33-39. PubMed ID: 28157586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determination of Pathogenicity of Brown A; Zamanpoor M; Love DR; Prosser DO Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2019 Nov; 19(4):e324-e334. PubMed ID: 31897316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion. Abou Tayoun AN; Pesaran T; DiStefano MT; Oza A; Rehm HL; Biesecker LG; Harrison SM; Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 30192042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adaptation of ACMG-ClinGen Technical Standards for Copy Number Variant Interpretation Concordance. Zhang K; Lin G; Han D; Han Y; Peng R; Li J Front Genet; 2022; 13():829728. PubMed ID: 35360839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The value of genomic variant ClinVar submissions from clinical providers: Beyond the addition of novel variants. Wain KE; Palen E; Savatt JM; Shuman D; Finucane B; Seeley A; Challman TD; Myers SM; Martin CL Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1660-1667. PubMed ID: 30311381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. ClinGen's RASopathy Expert Panel consensus methods for variant interpretation. Gelb BD; Cavé H; Dillon MW; Gripp KW; Lee JA; Mason-Suares H; Rauen KA; Williams B; Zenker M; Vincent LM; Genet Med; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29493581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]